HUM Reference Review & Ranking

Aggregated Scores from Top Experts & Community

IEMRanking.com Home HUM Reference

HUM Reference Average Reviewer Scores

Crin
Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

6

Generally Unfavorable

HUM Reference Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

HUM Reference reviewed by:

Crin 5.5 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B- Tech
Basically sounds like a shallow-fit ER4S.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

HUM Reference reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 6.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
Strengths: Solid neutral tuning with good clarity. Weaknesses: Imaging and soundstage depth limits the potential of this monitor.

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: B- Mids: B+ Treble: B Soundstage: B+ Details: A Imaging: B

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

HUM Reference Infos

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Flawed execution of tonal character. Noticeable peaks/dips affect timbre and coherence. May suit specific genres but lacks refinement.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Competent but unremarkable. Decent detail retrieval in quieter tracks, though busy sections challenge cohesion. Imaging is average, lacking depth.
Bass B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details A
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Top alternatives for HUM Reference

IEM Price Score
Thieaudio Monarch MK IV $1,149 8.9
Dunu Glacier $1,349.99 8.7
FiiO FX17 $1,499 8.7
Letshuoer Mystic 8 $1,000 8.6
Symphonium Crimson $1,500 8.4
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter $1,599 8.3
Thieaudio Prestige LTD $1,300 8.3
Thieaudio Monarch MK3 $1,000 8.2
Sony IER Z1R $1,700 8.2
Thieaudio Hype 10 $899 8.1
Best IEMs from $1,000 - $2,000
Write own User-Review for HUM Reference
Please to write User Reviews
IEM Comparison Tool new
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Be the first to share your experience!

Footer