IEMRanking.com
Home
Ikko OH10
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.8Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.4Gaming Grade
C+Ikko OH10 Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+1BA
Tuning Type: V-shape
Brand: Ikko Top Ikko IEMs
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Great bass response and surprisingly good treble extension if you can hear the 15kHz peak. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B
Mids: C-
Treble: C+
Dynamics: B
Details: C-
Imaging: B
Power bass with good details Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A-
Mids: A-
Treble: A-
Your standard "chifi V" but done fairly well. Decently technical. Crin Youtube Channel
Comment: "Fun"-sounding V shape iem, also suitable for bassheads. Narrow soundstage which occassional bass bloom
Bass: C+
Mids: D+
Treble: C-
Soundstage: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Ikko OH10 Infos
Compare Ikko OH10 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Ikko OH10 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Offers better mids, details and soundstage.
|
7.7 |
Ikko OH10 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.6 |
Ikko OH10 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Offers better details, soundstage and mids.
|
7.6 |
Ikko OH10 vs. CrinEar Daybreak
Offers better details, mids and imaging.
|
7.3 |
Ikko OH10 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
Offers better details, soundstage and bass.
|
7.3 |
Ikko OH10 vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
Offers better mids, bass and soundstage.
|
7.2 |
Ikko OH10 vs. EPZ P50
Offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7 |
Ikko OH10 vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
Ikko OH10 vs. Pula PA02
Offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
|
7 |
Ikko OH10 vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids
C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage
C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review