Ikko OH10 VS FATfreq x HBB Deuce

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Ikko OH10 and FATfreq x HBB Deuce use 1DD+1BA and 2DD driver setups respectively. Ikko OH10 costs $200 while FATfreq x HBB Deuce costs $239. FATfreq x HBB Deuce is $39 more expensive. FATfreq x HBB Deuce holds a decisive 1.3-point edge in reviewer scores (5.8 vs 7.2). FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better bass with a 1-point edge, FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better mids with a 2.2-point edge and FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Ikko OH10 FATfreq x HBB Deuce
Bass 6 7
Mids 4.8 7
Treble 5.3 5.5
Details 4.5 7.2
Soundstage 5 6
Imaging 5.5 7.2
Dynamics 6 6
Tonality 4.8 6.6
Technicalities 5.7 5.8

Ikko OH10 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T
Precogvision Tim Tuned Crin
Z-Reviews
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed


FATfreq x HBB Deuce Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Jays Audio
Drew / Audionotions Bad Guy Good Audio Z-Reviews
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7.2

Generally Favorable


Ikko OH10 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Ikko OH10 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.4

Gaming Grade

C+

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

Ikko OH10 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

Ikko OH10 Reviews

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
Z-Reviews 7.2 * score normalized
Precogvision 5.1 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Great bass response and surprisingly good treble extension if you can hear the 15kHz peak.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: B Mids: C- Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Details: C- Imaging: B
Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
A- Tech
Power bass with good details

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
- Tim Tuned
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A-
Crin 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B- Tech
Your standard "chifi V" but done fairly well. Decently technical.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin
Shuwa-T 4.6 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C+ Tech
Comment: "Fun"-sounding V shape iem, also suitable for bassheads. Narrow soundstage which occassional bass bloom

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: C+ Mids: D+ Treble: C- Soundstage: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C+

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Reviews

Super* Review 8.5* * score normalized
This is not my usual sound signature which I like. But it's a lot of fun in a unique way. One-trick pony.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
- Super* Review
Drew / Audionotions 7.5 Reviewer Score
Easy reccomendation for somoene looking for a basshead IEM that still retains some resemblence of neutrality through the mids and treble. Loaner

Drew / Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

- Drew / Audionotions
Bad Guy Good Audio 7.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
check links for more info:

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
- Bad Guy Good Audio
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: B
Z-Reviews 7 * score normalized
Jaytiss 6.8 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
Hits Hard, and is super fun. Suprisingly great mids.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: B
Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
B+ Tech
The defacto basshead rec before the more expensive stuff. Super fun sub-bass, textured, heavy, prolonged decay for more reverb in the bass, well-balanced as well, smooth and scales great. Tech is not its strong point, and DON'T buy from FatFreq directly!!!

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

Ikko OH10 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer