IEMRanking.com
Home
KZ CRN
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
2.9Very Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
2.3Gaming Grade
E+KZ CRN Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+1BA+1Mag
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs
Price (Msrp): $35
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
Hey a KZ that I like, ohh wait.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: E+
Dynamics: E+
Soundstage: C+
Reviewed by: Nymz
Lacks technicalities - mainly regarding detail, separation and dynamics. Stage is intimate. Timbre is funky. Notes are a bit blurry. Tuning is mostly fine. Nothing new at this current market.
Bass: E+
Mids: E+
Treble: E+
Details: E+
Imaging: E+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
KZ CRN Infos
Compare KZ CRN to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
KZ CRN vs. 7Hz Elua Ultra
7Hz Elua Ultra offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
6.7 |
KZ CRN vs. Moondrop Crescent
Similar overall performance.
|
6.3 |
KZ CRN vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Black
Similar overall performance.
|
5.8 |
KZ CRN vs. KZ D-Fi
KZ D-Fi offers better details, imaging and bass.
|
5.7 |
KZ CRN vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better bass, details and imaging.
|
5.5 |
KZ CRN vs. Ziigaat Nuo
Ziigaat Nuo offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
5.4 |
KZ CRN vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Abyss
Kinera Celest Wyvern Abyss offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
5.4 |
KZ CRN vs. Kiwi Ears CADENZA
Kiwi Ears CADENZA offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
|
5.3 |
KZ CRN vs. 7HZ G1
7HZ G1 offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
5.3 |
KZ CRN vs. CCA Trio
CCA Trio offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
5.3 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D-- Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.
Average Technical Grade
E+- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass
E+
Noticeably thin bass presence. Lacks body and texture, leaving low frequencies feeling hollow and underdeveloped.
Mids
D+
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics
E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage
C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
E+
Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.
Imaging
E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming
E+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review