KZ D-Fi - Reviews & Ratings
2 Reviews (B Tier | 5.7/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
KZ D-Fi
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.7Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.4Gaming Grade
C+KZ D-Fi Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: Neutral
Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs
Price (Msrp): $33
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
5.3
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
B-
Tech
check links for more info:
Bass: C+
Mids: B-
Treble: C+
Soundstage: B-
Details: B-
Imaging: B-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
KZ D-Fi Infos
Compare KZ D-Fi to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
KZ D-Fi vs. 7Hz Elua Ultra
7Hz Elua Ultra offers better soundstage and mids.
|
6.7 |
|
KZ D-Fi vs. Moondrop Crescent
Similar overall performance.
|
6.3 |
|
KZ D-Fi vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Black
Similar overall performance.
|
5.8 |
|
KZ D-Fi vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better bass and treble.
|
5.5 |
|
KZ D-Fi vs. Ziigaat Nuo
Ziigaat Nuo offers better soundstage.
|
5.4 |
|
KZ D-Fi vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Abyss
Kinera Celest Wyvern Abyss offers better soundstage.
|
5.4 |
|
KZ D-Fi vs. Kiwi Ears CADENZA
Kiwi Ears CADENZA offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
5.3 |
|
KZ D-Fi vs. CCA Trio
CCA Trio offers better soundstage.
|
5.3 |
|
KZ D-Fi vs. 7HZ G1
7HZ G1 offers better soundstage.
|
5.3 |
|
KZ D-Fi vs. BLON x HBB Z300
Similar overall performance.
|
5.1 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Soundstage
B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review