KZ ZA12 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 4.8/10)

IEMRanking.com Home KZ ZA12

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

4.8

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.9

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Jumps to a B Tier with a 80 ohm adapter. Pretty wild.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

KZ ZA12 Infos

Compare KZ ZA12 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
KZ ZA12 vs. Moondrop May
Moondrop May offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
6.5
KZ ZA12 vs. Simgot EW300
Similar overall performance.
6.3
KZ ZA12 vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better soundstage.
6.2
KZ ZA12 vs. Intime Sora Light
Intime Sora Light offers better soundstage, dynamics and mids.
6
KZ ZA12 vs. Kefine Delci
Kefine Delci offers better dynamics and soundstage.
6
KZ ZA12 vs. TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red
TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
5.9
KZ ZA12 vs. Truthear Zero: Blue 2
Truthear Zero: Blue 2 offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
5.7
KZ ZA12 vs. Tin Hifi T3
Similar overall performance.
5.5
KZ ZA12 vs. Tin Hifi T2 Plus
Similar overall performance.
5.5
KZ ZA12 vs. Fiio JD7
Similar overall performance.
5.5
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer