Muse HiFi Power - Reviews & Ratings
2 Reviews (C Tier | 4.7/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
Muse HiFi Power
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.7Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.2Gaming Grade
C+Muse HiFi Power Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: Bright V-shape
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
4.9
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
B-
Tech
Comment: A warmer planar that focuses on coherence rather than technical performance.
Punchy midbass, more forward midrange than the other planars
Lower treble dip, suffers from similar mushy transients
Bass: C+
Mids: C
Treble: D
Soundstage: B
Details: B-
Imaging: B-
Reviewed by: Crin
4.5
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
B-
Tech
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Muse HiFi Power Infos
Compare Muse HiFi Power to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Muse HiFi Power vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7.7 |
|
Muse HiFi Power vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7.6 |
|
Muse HiFi Power vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7.6 |
|
Muse HiFi Power vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7.3 |
|
Muse HiFi Power vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better treble, bass and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
Muse HiFi Power vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.2 |
|
Muse HiFi Power vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7 |
|
Muse HiFi Power vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
|
Muse HiFi Power vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
6.9 |
|
Muse HiFi Power vs. 7Hz Timeless 2
7Hz Timeless 2 offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review