Oriolus Monachaa - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (B Tier | 6.9/10)

Home Oriolus Monachaa

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the Oriolus Monachaa is a positive pick among reviewers, who feel it delivers a well-rounded experience.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.9

Cautiously Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.6

Gaming Grade

D+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 7.4 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Very nice bass and decent treble. Midrange timbre and decay sound off. Technicalities are average for its price range. Cons: Poor techs/price, vocal timbre off.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A Dynamics: A- Details: A Imaging: A

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
E+ Tech
Poor Value, I can't recomend it.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: E+ Dynamics: C- Soundstage: B

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
6 community members have rated the Oriolus Monachaa at an average of 4.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Oriolus Monachaa Infos

Discuss Oriolus Monachaa with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Oriolus Monachaa discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Oriolus Monachaa to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Oriolus Monachaa reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Oriolus Monachaa vs. Thieaudio Valhalla
Thieaudio Valhalla offers better treble, soundstage and dynamics.
8.9
Oriolus Monachaa vs. Elysian Apostle
Elysian Apostle offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
8.8
Oriolus Monachaa vs. Fiio FX17
Fiio FX17 offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
8.8
Oriolus Monachaa vs. Dunu Glacier
Dunu Glacier offers better soundstage, dynamics and treble.
8.7
Oriolus Monachaa vs. Lime Ears Incognita
Lime Ears Incognita offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
8.5
Oriolus Monachaa vs. 64 Audio Tia Trio
64 Audio Tia Trio offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
8.5
Oriolus Monachaa vs. Symphonium Crimson
Symphonium Crimson offers better treble, soundstage and mids.
8.4
Oriolus Monachaa vs. 64 Audio Volur
64 Audio Volur offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
8.4
Oriolus Monachaa vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 12
Letshuoer Cadenza 12 offers better soundstage, treble and mids.
8.4
Oriolus Monachaa vs. Linsoul x HBB Jupiter
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
8.3
Best IEMs from $1,000 - $2,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Textural information blurs together, making the stage feel pinched and gray. Instrument edges blur together frequently.
Bass A+
The bass digs deep with authority while staying impeccably textured. No sense of bloom muddies the mids.
Mids B
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble C
Treble is adequate overall, though its texture can feel coarse. Longer sessions may expose grain.
Dynamics B-
Expect solid impact overall, even if finer gradations feel a touch smoothed. Micro-details could still be sharper.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Details A
Resolution feels both high and relaxed, capturing nuance with ease. There's zero smearing even at high volume.
Imaging A
Depth mapping feels natural and accurate, supporting convincing immersion. Depth mapping feels precise and natural.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer