IEMRanking.com
Home
ORIVETI OD200
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.5Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
2.8Gaming Grade
D-ORIVETI OD200 Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
Just ok, not a huge fan but I can see how others might like it.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: E+
Dynamics: D
Soundstage: B
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
ORIVETI OD200 Infos
Compare ORIVETI OD200 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
ORIVETI OD200 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
7.7 |
ORIVETI OD200 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
7.6 |
ORIVETI OD200 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.6 |
ORIVETI OD200 vs. Crinear Daybreak
Crinear Daybreak offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.3 |
ORIVETI OD200 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
|
7.3 |
ORIVETI OD200 vs. FatFreq x HBB Deuce
FatFreq x HBB Deuce offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
7.2 |
ORIVETI OD200 vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7 |
ORIVETI OD200 vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
ORIVETI OD200 vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
6.9 |
ORIVETI OD200 vs. 7Hz Timeless 2
7Hz Timeless 2 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
E+- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming
D-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review