Periodic Audio Ti - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (E Tier | 1.2/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
Periodic Audio Ti
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
1.2Abysmal
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
1.2Gaming Grade
E-Periodic Audio Ti Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: Periodic Audio Top Periodic Audio IEMs
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Precogvision
1.2
Reviewer Score
E
Tuning
E-
Tech
Wait, this is the intended sound? My unit isn't just broken? Yiiikes.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: E+
Mids: E+
Treble: E-
Dynamics: E-
Details: E-
Imaging: E-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Periodic Audio Ti Infos
Compare Periodic Audio Ti to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Periodic Audio Ti vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better imaging, treble and details.
|
7.7 |
|
Periodic Audio Ti vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
Periodic Audio Ti vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, dynamics and imaging.
|
7.6 |
|
Periodic Audio Ti vs. Crinear Daybreak
Crinear Daybreak offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
Periodic Audio Ti vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, imaging and details.
|
7.3 |
|
Periodic Audio Ti vs. FatFreq x HBB Deuce
FatFreq x HBB Deuce offers better bass, mids and dynamics.
|
7.2 |
|
Periodic Audio Ti vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7 |
|
Periodic Audio Ti vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
|
Periodic Audio Ti vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
6.9 |
|
Periodic Audio Ti vs. 7Hz Timeless 2
7Hz Timeless 2 offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
E- Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.
Average Technical Grade
E-- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass
E+
Noticeably thin bass presence. Lacks body and texture, leaving low frequencies feeling hollow and underdeveloped.
Mids
E+
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble
E-
Treble is extremely rolled off and veiled. High frequencies are barely perceptible with significant loss of detail.
Dynamics
E-
Extremely poor dynamic expression. Lacks any sense of impact or volume gradation, making music feel one-dimensional.
Details
E-
Extremely poor resolution. Fine details are completely lost, leaving only a vague impression of the music's structure.
Imaging
E-
Extremely vague imaging with no localization. All elements seem to originate from a single undefined point in space.
Gaming
E-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review