PULA Anvil - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (B Tier | 6.3/10)

IEMRanking.com Home PULA Anvil

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Gizaudio Axel Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.3

Gaming Grade

B

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
Nice set, kinda mellow.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 6.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
The BCD effect is awesome, but may not be for everyone. Punchy bass, great mid-range texture, immersive soundstage, BCD that works, and excellent resolution. Could use more sub-bass.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Good low-end impact and slam, but boomy/soft in the bass texture, the BCD has no effect in the low-end, more prominent in the uppermids/treble which can lead to some sharp/graininess/jaggity timbre. Feels like they tried to copy the Tea Pros but failed, worse in both tuning and driver quality - I'd just get the D62 or save up for the Tea Pros

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

PULA Anvil Infos

Compare PULA Anvil to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
PULA Anvil vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
7.7
PULA Anvil vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.6
PULA Anvil vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.6
PULA Anvil vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.3
PULA Anvil vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
7.3
PULA Anvil vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
7.2
PULA Anvil vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better treble and mids.
7
PULA Anvil vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
7
PULA Anvil vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
6.9
PULA Anvil vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better mids.
6.9
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Buy

Footer