Sennheiser IE900 - Reviews & Ratings

6 Reviews (A Tier | 7.8/10)

Home Sennheiser IE900

Summary

Based on 6 reviews, the Sennheiser IE900 is well liked by reviewers, with coverage that regularly highlights its strengths.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.8

Strongly Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 9* * score rescaled + normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Sennheiser IE900 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $1,326

Buy Sennheiser IE900 on audio46

Reviewed by: Audionotions

Audionotions 8.5 Reviewer Score
I usually don't like things that aren't all rounders but this might be the exception. Bass is incredible - best in class - great texture, fantastic physicality. Treble response is great too - pretty resolving. There is a noticeable recession in the upper mids, giving these a fairly U/V shaped sound signature - violins, for example, lack a bit of brightness/bite that I would hope for. But unlike other V-shaped IEMs, the mids aren't offensive. Incredibly fun to listen to. Probably the best single DD available. EQ highly recommended.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
I don't get it, not even a little.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: A

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
Excelllent bass - simply excellent. Midrange could use some work, as could the generally average imaging chops.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: S+ Mids: C+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Details: A- Imaging: B

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6.5 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A+ Tech
Well-resolving DD IEM with excellent treble control, though with somewhat weak mid-high harmonics.
Youtube Video Summary

Sennheiser’s IE900 delivers a sub-bass–focused tuning with tight control and real tactility, but its trademark upper-mid recession (≈2–5 kHz) keeps vocals and instruments a step back. A pronounced 9–10 kHz lift adds sparkle and air; depending on tolerance, that energy can read either engaging or a touch sharp/sibilant. Technical chops are strong for a single DD—resolution and microdetail are genuinely competitive.

The sticking point is tonal balance and value. While the IE900 is refined and punchy, that blunted midrange character contrasts with its bright treble, creating a love-it-or-leave-it “blue cheese” appeal. Against peers—and especially Sennheiser’s own IE600, which fixes the mids while preserving similar resolution—the IE900’s $1,300 price starts to look tough.

In short: choose the IE900 for its clean sub-bass slam, crisp transients, and airy top if that treble profile hits the spot. If the priority is natural mids and better value without giving up much technical ability, the IE600 feels like the smarter pick—and the real redemption of Sennheiser’s IEM line.


Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.9 * score rescaled + normalized
10 community members have rated the Sennheiser IE900 at an average of 4.7/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Exceptional.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Sennheiser IE900 Infos

Discuss Sennheiser IE900 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Sennheiser IE900 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Sennheiser IE900 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Sennheiser IE900 vs. Fiio FX17
Fiio FX17 offers better imaging, details and mids.
8.8
Sennheiser IE900 vs. Elysian Apostle
Elysian Apostle offers better mids, imaging and treble.
8.8
Sennheiser IE900 vs. AFUL Dawn-X
AFUL Dawn-X offers better mids, treble and imaging.
8.7
Sennheiser IE900 vs. Dunu Glacier
Dunu Glacier offers better dynamics, imaging and treble.
8.7
Sennheiser IE900 vs. ThieAudio Monarch MK4
ThieAudio Monarch MK4 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
8.5
Sennheiser IE900 vs. Lime Ears Incognita
Lime Ears Incognita offers better imaging, mids and details.
8.5
Sennheiser IE900 vs. Symphonium Crimson
Symphonium Crimson offers better imaging, mids and treble.
8.4
Sennheiser IE900 vs. Linsoul x HBB Jupiter
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter offers better dynamics, imaging and mids.
8.3
Sennheiser IE900 vs. ThieAudio Prestige LTD
ThieAudio Prestige LTD offers better mids, treble and imaging.
8.2
Sennheiser IE900 vs. Sony IER Z1R
Sony IER Z1R offers better imaging, treble and mids.
8.1
Best IEMs from $1,000 - $2,000

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
Bass S+
Expect a flagship-caliber bass presentation that defines impact, texture, and depth. Power never compromises precision.
Mids B-
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics B+
The performance feels robust, with satisfying punch and natural transitions. Nuances are easy to follow.
Soundstage A
The stage stretches in every direction, carving out clear three-dimensional pockets for each player. Placement accuracy impresses from the start.
Details A-
Micro-details glide to the forefront effortlessly while timbre remains natural. Ambient cues are vivid and lifelike.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement and clear front/back localization. Positions snap into place convincingly.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Buy

Footer