Tangzu Wu Zetian [5.5/10]
Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for Tangzu Wu Zetian
IEMRanking.com
Home
Tangzu Wu Zetian
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.5Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5Gaming Grade
C+Tangzu Wu Zetian Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: V-shape
Brand: TangZu Top TangZu IEMs
Price (Msrp): $150
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Audionotions
5.5
Reviewer Score
V-signature. Not really hearing much of a planar timbre here - could have told me it was DD and I might have believed it. A bit fuzzy and recessed through the mids. Bass is boomy but not well controlled. Previously Owned
Reviewed by: Nymz
5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
V-shape. Great bass for a plannar. Nice imaging. Treble is still planar wonky but not terrible. Might be my favourite planar so far, but it seems to need power than competition.
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tangzu Wu Zetian Infos
Compare Tangzu Wu Zetian to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better details, imaging and bass.
|
7.3 |
|
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better treble, bass and details.
|
7.1 |
|
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better mids and treble.
|
7 |
|
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7 |
|
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better mids and treble.
|
7 |
|
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better mids.
|
6.9 |
|
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better treble and mids.
|
6.8 |
|
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Ziigaat Lush
Ziigaat Lush offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
6.8 |
|
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Truthear Nova
Truthear Nova offers better details, bass and imaging.
|
6.7 |
|
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
6.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review