Tangzu Wu Zetian - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (B Tier | 5.5/10)

Home Reviewer Paul Wasabii Tangzu Wu Zetian

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the Tangzu Wu Zetian is a sensible option among reviewers, especially for listeners seeking balance without drama.

Average Reviewer Scores

Audionotions Nymz
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Tangzu Wu Zetian Details

Driver Configuration:

Tuning Type: V-Shaped

Top V-Shaped IEMs

Brand: TangZu Top TangZu IEMs

Price (Msrp): $150

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

Reviewed by: Audionotions

Audionotions 5.5 Reviewer Score
V-signature. Not really hearing much of a planar timbre here - could have told me it was DD and I might have believed it. A bit fuzzy and recessed through the mids. Bass is boomy but not well controlled.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
V-shape. Great bass for a plannar. Nice imaging. Treble is still planar wonky but not terrible. Might be my favourite planar so far, but it seems to need power than competition.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Tangzu Wu Zetian Infos

Discuss Tangzu Wu Zetian with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Tangzu Wu Zetian discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Tangzu Wu Zetian to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Tangzu Wu Zetian reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Letshuoer S12 Ultra
Letshuoer S12 Ultra offers better details, bass and treble.
Show Letshuoer S12 Ultra
 7.6
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better mids and treble.
Show Dunu Kima 2
 7.4
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Crinear Daybreak
Crinear Daybreak offers better details, imaging and bass.
Show Crinear Daybreak
 7.3
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. CCA HYDRO
CCA HYDRO offers better mids.
Show CCA HYDRO
 7.3
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better treble, bass and details.
Show Aful Explorer
 7.3
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. HIDIZS MP143
Similar overall performance.
Show HIDIZS MP143
 7.2
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better imaging, mids and treble.
Show Kiwi Ears Aether
 7.2
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Myer Audio CKLVX D41
Myer Audio CKLVX D41 offers better mids, details and imaging.
Show Myer Audio CKLVX D41
 7.1
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better mids and treble.
Show Tanchjim Fission
 7.1
Tangzu Wu Zetian vs. Padsmith IEM
Similar overall performance.
Show Padsmith IEM
 7
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Bass C+
It delivers adequate punch and texture, though nothing stands out. Sub-bass presence is hinted rather than delivered.
Mids C+
The region sounds agreeable overall, delivering clarity without flashiness. Slight warmth keeps things easy-going.
Treble C+
The top end is tidy and serviceable, adding air without overdoing it. Extension is decent for casual listening.
Details C+
Plenty of nuance surfaces, just not the last layer of shimmer. It balances clarity with an easygoing tone.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy provides good left/right placement with an acceptable center image. Instruments stay anchored once placed.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer