Tangzu Zetian Wu [6.1/10]

Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for Tangzu Zetian Wu

IEMRanking.com Home Tangzu Zetian Wu

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T Tim Tuned
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

6.1

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.5

Gaming Grade

B+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5.9 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B Tech
Comment: Can be disguised as a DD type of speed. Tuned to be balanced rather than V with more vocal emphasis, bass slams hard for a planar Mediocre soundstage and not the speediest of planar decay, overly warm

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: B+ Treble: C- Soundstage: B Details: B+ Imaging: B+

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
A- Tech
Good mild v-shape tuning with little to fault Not ideal soundstage for the price

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Tangzu Zetian Wu Infos

Compare Tangzu Zetian Wu to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Tangzu Zetian Wu vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better details, imaging and bass.
7.3
Tangzu Zetian Wu vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better treble and soundstage.
7.1
Tangzu Zetian Wu vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better treble and soundstage.
7
Tangzu Zetian Wu vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better treble, soundstage and bass.
7
Tangzu Zetian Wu vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better soundstage and treble.
7
Tangzu Zetian Wu vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Similar overall performance.
6.9
Tangzu Zetian Wu vs. Kiwi Ears Aether
Kiwi Ears Aether offers better treble and soundstage.
6.8
Tangzu Zetian Wu vs. Ziigaat Lush
Ziigaat Lush offers better treble, soundstage and bass.
6.8
Tangzu Zetian Wu vs. Truthear Nova
Truthear Nova offers better treble, soundstage and details.
6.7
Tangzu Zetian Wu vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better soundstage, bass and treble.
6.7
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B+
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details B+
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B+
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer