Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday [6.2/10]
Reviews (8), scores and comparisons for Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday
IEMRanking.com
Home
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.2Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.3Gaming Grade
BTangzu Zetian Wu Heyday Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: V-shape
Brand: TangZu Top TangZu IEMs
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
6.6
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
B+
Tech
Comment: Imagine getting a 2 pin cable's polarity wrong, please Tangzu work on your QC.
Smooth midrange, meaty low with characteristic planar subbass extension, relatively smooth treble; detail retrieval is above average
Transition from midbass to lower mids isn't clear cut, not as clean. Doesn't sound special tbh.
Bass: B+
Mids: B+
Treble: B
Soundstage: B+
Details: A-
Imaging: A-
Reviewed by: Audionotions
6.5
Reviewer Score
Well-tuned, technical, does nothing wrong. Build quality is much better than OG Wu. Even the driver used is different. They should have renamed it instead of keeping the Wu Zetian name because it's an entirely different beast! Love the sound! Well extended, punchy bass, great clarity through mids, treble that is sparkly and well extended without sibilance or fatigue. Shell size is large and I get hot spots when listening for longer periods. Previously Owned
Reviewed by: Tim Tuned
6.5
Reviewer Score
B+
Tuning
A+
Tech
More detailed than original + better bass
treble can be smoother
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+
Mids: A+
Treble: A-
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
6.5
Reviewer Score
A
Tuning
A
Tech
Clean and neutral with treble emphasis. Great technical performance. Airy and lively treble. Bass could use more impact and weight. Vocals are on the lighter side of things.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
5.8
Reviewer Score
C
Tuning
C+
Tech
I can't really recomend this with other planars at much cheaper.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C-
Soundstage: B
Reviewed by:
Fresh Reviews
5.5*
* The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
Reviewed by: Nymz
5.3
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Mid-range focused planar for those looking for a great planar set that is not V-shaped. Love it.
Bass: C+
Mids: B
Treble: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday Infos
Compare Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better dynamics, imaging and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.6 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, bass and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
|
7.2 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
|
7 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
B+
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids
B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble
B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging
B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming
B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review