Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday - Reviews & Ratings
9 Reviews (B Tier | 6.5/10)
Home
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday
Summary
Based on 9 reviews, the Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday is earning a favorable overall impression from reviewers thanks to its consistent performance.
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.5Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.3Gaming Grade
BTangzu Zetian Wu Heyday Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: V-Shaped
Brand: TangZu Top TangZu IEMs
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
6.6
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
B+
Tech
Comment: Imagine getting a 2 pin cable's polarity wrong, please Tangzu work on your QC.
Smooth midrange, meaty low with characteristic planar subbass extension, relatively smooth treble; detail retrieval is above average
Transition from midbass to lower mids isn't clear cut, not as clean. Doesn't sound special tbh.
Bass: B+
Mids: B+
Treble: B
Soundstage: B+
Details: A-
Imaging: A-
Buy Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday on HiFiGO
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.
Price: $259
Buy Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday on HiFiGO
Price: $259
Buy Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday on HiFiGO
Reviewed by: Audionotions
6.5
Reviewer Score
Well-tuned, technical, does nothing wrong. Build quality is much better than OG Wu. Even the driver used is different. They should have renamed it instead of keeping the Wu Zetian name because it's an entirely different beast! Love the sound! Well extended, punchy bass, great clarity through mids, treble that is sparkly and well extended without sibilance or fatigue. Shell size is large and I get hot spots when listening for longer periods.
Reviewed by: Tim Tuned
6.5
Reviewer Score
B+
Tuning
A+
Tech
More detailed than original + better bass
treble can be smoother
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+
Mids: A+
Treble: A-
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
6.5
Reviewer Score
A
Tuning
A
Tech
Clean and neutral with treble emphasis. Great technical performance. Airy and lively treble. Bass could use more impact and weight. Vocals are on the lighter side of things.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score rescaled + normalized
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
5.8
Reviewer Score
C
Tuning
C+
Tech
I can't really recomend this with other planars at much cheaper.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C-
Soundstage: B
Reviewed by:
Fresh Reviews
5.5*
* The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming
Score
Reviewed by: Nymz
5.3
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Mid-range focused planar for those looking for a great planar set that is not V-shaped. Love it.
Bass: C+
Mids: B
Treble: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org
8.4
* score rescaled + normalized
15 community members have rated the Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday at an average of 4.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday Infos
Discuss Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday with the community
Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.
Compare Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better dynamics, imaging and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Letshuoer S12 Ultra
Letshuoer S12 Ultra offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.6 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.5 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
|
7.4 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Crinear Daybreak
Crinear Daybreak offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. Hidizs MP145
Hidizs MP145 offers better dynamics, details and soundstage.
|
7.3 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
|
7.3 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better dynamics, imaging and details.
|
7.2 |
|
Tangzu Zetian Wu Heyday vs. FatFreq x HBB Deuce
FatFreq x HBB Deuce offers better dynamics, mids and bass.
|
7.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Bass
B+
Expect a solid thump that keeps the rhythm engaging yet controlled. Sub-bass presence is supportive, not overwhelming.
Mids
B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble
B-
The top end is tidy and serviceable, adding air without overdoing it. Extension is decent for casual listening.
Dynamics
C-
The system delivers passable punch but never surprises. Punch is modest rather than exciting.
Soundstage
B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Details
B
Finer gestures snap into focus without sounding clinical or forced. Layering holds strong across genres.
Imaging
B
Depth cues step forward, giving performances a dimensional presence. Front-to-back cues become more immersive.
Gaming
B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review