Tri i3 Mk3 [6.6/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for Tri i3 Mk3

IEMRanking.com Home Tri i3 Mk3

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

6.6

Cautiously Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.3

Gaming Grade

B

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B+ Tech
Pleasant signature with no major spikes in treble, zero planar timbre Bass quantity is on the lower side, highs are not as prominent

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: A+ Treble: B+ Soundstage: B+ Details: A- Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.3 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Very nice neutral set, beautiful, but so many good sets.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: D Soundstage: A-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Tri i3 Mk3 Infos

Compare Tri i3 Mk3 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
7.7
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
7.6
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, bass and details.
7.6
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better dynamics, bass and details.
7.3
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, bass and soundstage.
7.3
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better dynamics and bass.
7.2
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
7
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
7
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
7
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
6.9
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer