IEMRanking.com
Home
Tri i3 Mk3
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.6Cautiously Favorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.3Gaming Grade
BTri i3 Mk3 Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: Dead Neutral
Price (Msrp): $199
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
Pleasant signature with no major spikes in treble, zero planar timbre
Bass quantity is on the lower side, highs are not as prominent
Bass: B
Mids: A+
Treble: B+
Soundstage: B+
Details: A-
Imaging: A-
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
Very nice neutral set, beautiful, but so many good sets.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B
Treble: B
Dynamics: D
Soundstage: A-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tri i3 Mk3 Infos
Compare Tri i3 Mk3 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
|
7.7 |
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
|
7.6 |
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, bass and details.
|
7.6 |
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better dynamics, bass and details.
|
7.3 |
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, bass and soundstage.
|
7.3 |
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better dynamics and bass.
|
7.2 |
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
|
7 |
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
|
7 |
Tri i3 Mk3 vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids
A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble
B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage
B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging
A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming
B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review