Aful Performer 5+2 VS Linsoul x HBB Jupiter

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Aful Performer 5+2 and Linsoul x HBB Jupiter use 2DD+4BA+1Planar and 1DD+6BA+4EST driver setups respectively. Aful Performer 5+2 costs $229 while Linsoul x HBB Jupiter costs $1,599. Linsoul x HBB Jupiter is $1,370 more expensive. Linsoul x HBB Jupiter holds a slight 0.4-point edge in reviewer scores (7.7 vs 8.2). Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better mids with a 1.2-point edge, Aful Performer 5+2 has better treble with a 0.6-point edge, Linsoul x HBB Jupiter has significantly better dynamics with a 1.4-point edge and Aful Performer 5+2 has slightly better imaging with a 0.4-point edge.

Insights

Metric Aful Performer 5+2 Linsoul x HBB Jupiter
Bass 8 8
Mids 8 6.8
Treble 7.6 7
Details 7.6 7.5
Soundstage 7.8 7.8
Imaging 7.9 7.5
Dynamics 7.6 9
Tonality 7.6 7.9
Technicalities 7.5 7.8

Aful Performer 5+2 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio
Gizaudio Axel Tim Tuned IEMRanking AI
Z-Reviews Jaytiss Audionotions Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7.7

Strongly Favorable


Linsoul x HBB Jupiter Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T
Jaytiss Bad Guy Good Audio IEMRanking AI

Average Reviewer Score:

8.2

Very Positive


Reviews Comparison

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
My kind of neutral, improves a lot on my favorites.

Aful Performer 5+2 lands as a hybrid of the beloved Performer 5 and the punchier Explorer. The unboxing is the familiar P5 affair—same case, same style of tips—nothing flashy, but solid. The shell mirrors the P5 in size with a comfy little stabilizing wing that locks in well. No metal nozzle or front filter here, yet tip retention is secure and hassle-free. The flat 2-pin socket is straightforward, and the stock cable feels thick and supple with a reliable chin slider and handy red/blue channel markers. Overall: understated build, great ergonomics, daily-driver ready.

Sonically, this one aims neutral with a very distinct top end—clean, dynamic, incisive. Think switching from black-and-white to color; cymbals and overtones pop with a slightly crunchy/pristine edge that energizes detail without turning harsh on good recordings. Bass isn’t about sheer quantity; it’s about slam and dynamics—quick on the draw, well-controlled, and satisfying when called upon. Vocals sit a notch forward, microdetail is strong, and the overall presentation is coherent, clear, and technical with convincing stage, resolution, and imaging. Not a treble-shy or bass-bombed tuning—more a refined all-rounder for those who want clarity and bite.

Versus the original P5, the 5+2 fixes the missing “air” and soft edges, trading them for crisper transients and better extension. Compared with Explorer (a value champ), the 5+2 brings superior upper-treble reach, detail, and vocal focus. Against Performer 8 and Cantor, it feels more visceral—the P8 is smoother and more relaxed, while Cantor pulls finer microdetail but with less bass slam. Sets like Dino Quattro or J’s Estrella bring bigger fun or treble theatrics, yet the 5+2’s balance and everyday versatility win more often. Net take: a neutral-leaning, highly technical upgrade that stands tall in its bracket—easy to recommend to anyone chasing clarity, speed, and controlled impact over pure warmth or excess bass.

Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Linsoul x HBB Jupiter reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.6 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Great BASS, blarg trebble.

Premium build with a large, Monarch-like shell that sits extremely comfortably, accented by subtle blue flecks and a secure nozzle lip. The bundled 4.4mm cable feels upscale, while the case and tips are serviceable. There’s noted pricing controversy—an initial teaser around $1,000 for a handful of units before settling near $1,600—but the product itself presents as a polished, high-value package.

Sonically, this is a strong, impactful bass tuning with rich warmth that never smothers the mids. Female vocals pop, instrumentals sound lifelike, and earlier worries about a dark treble prove overstated; the tonal balance feels right and cohesive. Sub-bass digs deep, mid-bass hits with authority, and the overall presentation is sweet, engaging, and musical—the sort of set that invites long sessions without fatigue. It comes across as a top-tier collaboration with a crowd-pleasing signature for bass lovers who still care about clarity and timbre.

In comparisons, Dunu’s Mirai reads brighter and leaner with issues like hiss and channel imbalance on the sample heard, scoring around “three stars,” while Jupiter earns a decisive “five-star” nod. Against heavy hitters like Elysian Annihilator and Grand Maestro, those sets feel more resolute, but Jupiter is more fun, with a richer, sweeter tonality. Versus Fatfreq Scarlet Mini, Jupiter offers just-right bass (rolling off warmth around ~200 Hz) rather than excess. The conclusion is emphatic: a 9.04/10, described as a “love letter” to bassheads and one of the finest pure basshead tunings heard—highly recommended, especially if a second-hand deal brings the price closer to earth.

Mids: B Treble: A- Dynamics: S Soundstage: S-

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by IEMRanking AI

2025-09-07
IEMRanking AI 7.7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech

The AFUL Performer 5+2 (also listed as “Performer 7”) uses a 2DD+4BA+1 micro planar driver array and AFUL’s LC-network crossover plus a 3D-printed acoustic tube system, aiming for clean band splits without smearing. The shell also integrates a high-damping air-pressure balance system, a design AFUL has used across its line. Official listings put MSRP around $229 and outline the same core tech features.

Tonally it trends neutral with a sub-bass lift: bass has solid depth and texture, mids stay relatively linear, and the presence/treble region adds energy without veering into sharpness on most chains. Multiple reviews characterize it as warm-neutral with bass boost or slightly V-shaped depending on perspective, which matches listening notes about a lively but controlled upper end. Sensitivity and load are portable-friendly (≈109 dB, 15 Ω), so it reaches performance without demanding amplification.

Technicalities are competitive for the class: imaging is tidy with good instrument separation, micro-detail retrieval is above average, and soundstage is moderate (more width than depth). Build and comfort are typical resin-shell fare; some users note occasional lower-treble bite depending on tips and recordings, so treble-sensitive listeners may wish to pair accordingly. Overall value is strong at its price, especially if a clean, bass-supported neutral curve is the priority.


Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A Imaging: A

Linsoul x HBB Jupiter reviewed by IEMRanking AI

IEMRanking AI 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech

The Linsoul x HBB Jupiter delivers a powerful bass-forward signature with an 11dB sub-bass shelf that avoids bleeding into the mids, resulting in a warm yet articulate low end. Its hybrid driver setup combines a 10mm dynamic driver with Sonion BAs for texture and speed, while four modified EST drivers provide extended, non-fatiguing treble with excellent air and detail retrieval. Vocals and instruments retain clarity despite the bass emphasis, making it versatile across genres like rock and electronic.

Technical performance stands out with precise imaging and a spacious soundstage that feels both wide and deep. The 5-way crossover ensures strong coherence across the tribrid array, though the upper mids occasionally present vocals as overly forward. Comfort is solid despite the 11-driver shells, but the sparse accessories and forgettable packaging feel mismatched for the price.

While positioned above competitors like the ThieAudio Monarch MKIII, the Jupiter justifies its cost with superior resolution and a more engaging bass response. However, its limited marketing and awkward pricing may hinder broader adoption. The included premium cable and ergonomic design are highlights, though tip selection could be more comprehensive.


Aful Performer 5+2 (more reviews)

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8.5 * score normalized

Naming drama aside (P5+2? just call it Performer 7), this Aful packs a quirky driver party: 2DD for low end, 4 BA split across mids/treble, plus a tiny micro-planar for the highest sparkle, all marshaled by Aful’s neat miniature crossover. The shells are lightweight, comfy and prettier than they need to be; the cable feels “don’t bother swapping” nice, with 3.5 or 4.4 options. The box is loaded with silicone tips but no foam—a miss, because the right seal changes everything. Price target sits around $250, which sets expectations high but not ridiculous.

Stock silicone yields a surgical, respectful tuning with bass that skews neutral and controlled. Swap to well-sealing foam or hybrids and feed a juicy source (warm Class A or tubes) and the set wakes up—stage snaps into a cohesive scene right in front, imaging gets laser-etched, and that micro-planar adds a pinch-of-salt treble spice without turning harsh. It’s an up-close presentation—sometimes almost claustrophobically detailed—in the best way: think “men with trumpets in the head,” precise placement, and excellent extension up top. Not as rowdy as the Explorers; more like a surgeon in a Hawaiian shirt—technical, but with a wink.

Practical upside: the clarity and positioning make this great for gaming and even viable for mixing/mastering checks; just don’t crank it into pain territory. Bass stays tight and responsive, treble sails high, and coherence holds. Tip and source matter a lot: with foam + warm power, it sings; with plain silicone, it’s merely polite. Final tally: a confident 8.5/10—doing a lot right at its price, dinged half a point for making everyone do math on the name.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Audionotions

2025-09-28
Audionotions 8 Reviewer Score
Slightly warm leaning balanced - Very engaging, decent clarity. Hard to fault. Supercedes Performer8. Previously Owned

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
Overall it is sounding more visceral and incisive than the Performer 5.

Aful’s Performer 5+2 upgrades the original hybrid with 2DD + 4BA + 1 micro-planar tweeter and lands around $240–$250. The unboxing is practical: three sets of silicone tips, a pocketable puck case, and a soft, nicely draping cable (available in 4.4 or 3.5), though the braid can look a bit loose and the pre-formed hooks run large. The resin shells shift between blue and green under different light; fit is medium-large, very stable, and comfortable once the right tips are found. Note the narrow nozzle without a retaining lip and partially exposed bores/filters—tip grip is key and a little care prevents ear-gunk ingress.

Tonally this leans mild V-shaped: a clean midrange with a confident bass boost, a touch of lower-treble presence for bite, and well-extended air up top. The result is more incisive and punchy than the original P5, with clearer on/off transients that aid separation and layering. Trade-offs show as a hint of gritty/plasticky treble texture on cymbals and brushes—not harsh, but less natural than ideal—while the bass stays tight and exciting.

Against Aful’s Explorer, this sounds brighter, more spacious, and more technical; Explorer plays warmer/denser with smoother treble but less openness. Versus the pricier Thieaudio Oracle MK3, tuning is broadly similar: Oracle is smoother and deeper with a softer attack, while the Performer 5+2 brings more snap and engagement for less money. As a modern mid-tier hybrid, it absolutely still has a place—energetic, spacious, and well-executed—earning a solid four stars.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A- Tech
A detailed, engaging all-rounder that's exciting without being shouty or harsh. Smooth, neutral tuning with a bass boost, excellent bass quality, clean mids, forward vocals, and sparkly, incisive treble. Great detail. I wouldn’t change a thing.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A+ Tech
check links for more info:

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
Clean, balanced, neutral sound with good layering and tech. Relaxing vocals, but lacks power and last bit of vocal extension. Bass has good controll, but lacks impact. Has sizzly planar timbre in the treble. Safe but forgettable.

Performer 7 lands with a neutral-balanced, laid-back tuning and good treble reach. The presentation is clean and generally safe, though there’s a touch of sizzly “planar-ish” timbre up top. Technicals are solid for ~$200—slightly behind sets like Quintet and Super Mix 4, about on par with Nova. Bass from the dual 6 mm DDs is tight, controlled, and free of bleed, but lacks the slam and rumble of competitors using larger drivers; mids are well separated with decent layering.

The weak spot is vocal extension: a push around 1.5 kHz tries to bring them forward, but a dip through 3–6 kHz keeps them from opening up. Tamer upper-mids help avoid fatigue for rock/metal, yet the modest low-end impact leaves drums and basslines feeling uneventful. It’s a mid-volume set that doesn’t scale well—turning it up accentuates the 1.5 kHz emphasis and treble sizzle. Treble isn’t peaky, just a bit glassy at times; for K-pop the smoother mids can work if less extended vocals are acceptable.

As a value play, there are stronger options: Nova, Chopan, and Super Mix 4 offer better bang-for-buck; for a similar clean/neutral target, Tanchjim Origin sounds more natural with better bass texture and vocal reach, and DynaQuattro adds sub-bass and fuller vocals—none with the planar-ish timbre. Even AFUL’s own P5 is cheaper and more fun, while the Explorer undercuts the price and scales impressively. In today’s crowded market, P7 is a competent all-rounder but not distinctive enough to stand out.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Linsoul x HBB Jupiter (more reviews)

Linsoul x HBB Jupiter reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 8.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech

Linsoul x HBB Jupiter aims straight for flagship territory: a warm-tilted, slam-capable set that keeps the mid-bass → mids transition impeccably tidy. There’s real shove at 55 Hz and healthy weight around 100 Hz, but from ~200–300 Hz the response dips with intent, avoiding bleed and preserving vocal clarity. The result is a low end that thunders on hip-hop and classic rock kick drums while keeping male vocals husky but clean and female vocals free of mud. Upper mids and treble track more like Helios SE, Subtonic Storm, “the Bird,” Letshuoer Cadenza, and “Dawn” than like shoutier sets; energy near 5 kHz is moderated, and sparkle up around 12 kHz stays present without spike.

Hardware backs the tuning: an 11-driver array with 4 EST, a dynamic for the heavy lifting, and BAs smoothing the handoff into the mids. That division of labor helps with resolution and separation—handling tricky passages (distorted guitars, busy bass+kick overlaps) with composure and less masking than many DD-centric rivals. The overall presentation reads as warm, punchy, and refined: more bass authority than the comparison set list, mids that sit centered rather than in-your-face, and treble detail that reveals micro-stuff without tipping into fatigue.

Build and accessories match the premium pitch, including the beloved (and pricey) Linsoul Loops cable that visually suits the green/gold shells. Pricing is high, yet the claim is that it outperforms peers that cost similar or more by marrying sub-bass power to disciplined midrange and tasteful air. For listeners whose libraries span hip-hop, rock, R&B, and even classical, Jupiter reads as a statement piece: big-boy bass, clean mid articulation, and high-tier treble finesse—tuned to deliver musical weight without sacrificing balance.

Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A-

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel

Linsoul x HBB Jupiter reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 7.4 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Bass go boom boom Because bass go boom boom so the highs go doom doom sometimes

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: A- Soundstage: A- Details: A Imaging: A

Aful Performer 5+2 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Linsoul x HBB Jupiter User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Aful Performer 5+2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.5

Gaming Grade

A

Linsoul x HBB Jupiter Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.3

Gaming Grade

B

Aful Performer 5+2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A+
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble A
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics A
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details A
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion.

Linsoul x HBB Jupiter Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics S
Reference-class dynamics: perfect micro/macro contrast with lightning transients. Utterly realistic reproduction of musical energy.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details A
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Aful Performer 5+2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Linsoul x HBB Jupiter User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer