Audeze Euclid VS 64 Audio U4s

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Audeze Euclid and 64 Audio U4s are in-ear monitors. Audeze Euclid costs $1,300 while 64 Audio U4s costs $1,100. Audeze Euclid is $200 more expensive. 64 Audio U4s holds a decisive 2.3-point edge in reviewer scores (5.9 vs 8.2). 64 Audio U4s has significantly better bass with a 3-point edge, 64 Audio U4s has significantly better mids with a 2.8-point edge, 64 Audio U4s has significantly better treble with a 2.8-point edge, 64 Audio U4s has significantly better dynamics with a 2.7-point edge, Audeze Euclid has better details with a 0.8-point edge and 64 Audio U4s has significantly better imaging with a 1.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Audeze Euclid 64 Audio U4s
Bass 5 8
Mids 5 7.8
Treble 4 6.8
Details 8 7.3
Soundstage 5.9 6
Imaging 6 7.5
Dynamics 5 7.7
Tonality 5.1 7.4
Technicalities 7.4 7

Audeze Euclid Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

5.9

Mixed


64 Audio U4s Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Smirk Audio Jaytiss Precogvision
Audionotions
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

8.2

Very Positive


Audeze Euclid User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio U4s User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Audeze Euclid Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.7

Gaming Grade

B-

64 Audio U4s Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

Audeze Euclid Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Details A+
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers. Retrieves even the most minute details while maintaining natural timbre.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio U4s Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble B+
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Audeze Euclid Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
S- Tech
Certainly far better tuned than its predecessors with the same excellent technicalities.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5.3 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
B Tech
Very detailed, but treble rolls-off which makes it hard to tell sometimes.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Details: A+ Imaging: B

64 Audio U4s Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 9* * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your 64 Audio U4s or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $1,122

Buy 64 Audio U4s on audio46

Reviewed by: Audionotions

Audionotions 8.5 Reviewer Score
A step down in techs from U12T (possibly a half step down from U6T). But very well tuned and adds in a dynamic driver punch. Timbre is slightly improved compared to U12T due to the increase in midbass and upper mids energy. On the second hand market, 64Audio IEMs are among the best values in portable audio, the U4S is no exception. Previously Owned

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Reviewed by: Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 7.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
A tastefully colored U12t with a more intimate soundstage, a cutback in technicalities, and more bass realism.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Details: A Imaging: A+

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
It's a solid set, with great build quality, but sonically isn't the specialist that I want it to be.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A+ Treble: B Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 7.7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Fantastic colored tonality with options, and the unique technical qualities to back it up. M12/M15 modules recommended.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Details: A- Imaging: A-

Audeze Euclid User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio U4s User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer