Campfire IO VS Binary Dynaquattro

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs
My Ranking My Favorites

Campfire IO and Binary Dynaquattro use 2BA and 4DD driver setups respectively. Campfire IO costs $300 while Binary Dynaquattro costs $260. Campfire IO is $40 more expensive. Binary Dynaquattro holds a decisive 4.7-point edge in reviewer scores (2.7 vs 7.4). Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better mids with a 3-point edge, Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge and Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better soundstage with a 3-point edge.

Insights

Metric Campfire IO Binary Dynaquattro
Bass 3 7.4
Mids 3 6
Treble 3 6
Details 5.5 7.4
Soundstage 4 7
Imaging 5 7.4
Dynamics 2.7 8
Tonality 2.3 7.1
Technicalities 4.4 6.8

Campfire IO Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin
Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

2.7

Very Negative

Binary Dynaquattro Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Gizaudio Axel Z-Reviews Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable

Reviews Comparison

Campfire IO (more reviews)

Campfire IO reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 3.9 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
C Tech
Just no Tuning is so questionable that you wonder how it passed QC

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: D Mids: D Treble: D Soundstage: C- Details: B- Imaging: C+

Campfire IO reviewed by Crin

Crin 1.5 Reviewer Score
E Tuning
C- Tech
Tonality and timbre is all sorts of wrong. Lacks the technicalities to redeem it.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Binary Dynaquattro (more reviews)

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
It has great tuning, but lack serverly in some areas. Very fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A-
YouTube video thumbnail

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Shines when driven properly. Excellent bass, vocal-forward tuning, and natural timbre. Hard to drive, could use more treble extension.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7.2 * score normalized
check links for more info:

Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
Natural vocals, good treble extension, bass is tight and more resolving vs 61t and Davinci. Overall very well balanced and clean. There are some small peaks at 8-10k and 15-20K which can be an issue on some songs, and there is masking around 4-8k region, but overall, solid all-rounder.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Campfire IO User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Binary Dynaquattro User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Campfire IO Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.8

Gaming Grade

D+

Binary Dynaquattro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.9

Gaming Grade

B+

Campfire IO Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Soundstage C-
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Binary Dynaquattro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A+
Superb dynamic range - powerful yet nuanced. Exceptional transient response with lifelike impact and subtle volume gradations.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Campfire IO User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Binary Dynaquattro User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Recommended Pages

Page
Available IEMs (in stock)
Best IEMs under $50
Best IEMs under $100
Best IEMs under $200
Best IEMs under $600
Best IEMs under $1000
Best bass quality IEMs
Best dynamic range IEMs
IEMs with widest soundstage
IEMs with most details
IEMs with best imaging
Best value IEMs from below $50
Best value IEMs from $50 - $100
Best value IEMs from $100 - $200
Best value IEMs from $200 - $400
Best value IEMs from $400 - $600
Best value IEMs from $600 - $1,000
Buy

Footer