EPZ Q5 Pro V2 VS Celestee Pandomonon 2.0

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs
My Ranking My Favorites

EPZ Q5 Pro V2 and Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 are in-ear monitors. EPZ Q5 Pro V2 costs $56 while Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 costs $60. Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 is $4 more expensive. EPZ Q5 Pro V2 holds a decisive 1-point edge in reviewer scores (5.5 vs 4.5). EPZ Q5 Pro V2 has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, EPZ Q5 Pro V2 has significantly better dynamics with a 4-point edge and Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric EPZ Q5 Pro V2 Celestee Pandomonon 2.0
Mids 5 5
Treble 5 4
Soundstage 5 6
Dynamics 5 1
Tonality 4.5 4.5
Technicalities 5 4
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough EPZ Q5 Pro V2 and Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

EPZ Q5 Pro V2 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Mixed

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable

Reviews Comparison

EPZ Q5 Pro V2 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Bright for me.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C+

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Solid iem for those who enjoy a light bass shelf.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: B

EPZ Q5 Pro V2 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EPZ Q5 Pro V2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.9

Gaming Grade

C

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

EPZ Q5 Pro V2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Overall technicalities are acceptable, delivering enough clarity for casual sessions. Imaging is serviceable though not immersive.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width and a modest step forward in depth perception. There's a mild sense of width to enjoy.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
Highs are present enough yet carry a bit of grain and splash. Busy mixes can still feel a bit splashy.
Dynamics E-
Dynamic expression is extremely poor, draining impact from every hit. Notes lack the startle or decay they need.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

EPZ Q5 Pro V2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer