FAAEAL Hibiscus VS ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

FAAEAL Hibiscus and ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra are in-ear monitors. FAAEAL Hibiscus costs $40 while ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra costs $43. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra is $3 more expensive. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra holds a decisive 2.5-point edge in reviewer scores (3.5 vs 6). ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has better mids with a 0.5-point edge, ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge and ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better soundstage with a 1.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric FAAEAL Hibiscus ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
Bass 3.5 6
Mids 4.5 5
Treble 4 5
Details 4 6
Soundstage 4.5 6
Imaging 3.5 6
Dynamics 3.5 6
Tonality 3.5 5.5
Technicalities 3.8 5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough FAAEAL Hibiscus and ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

FAAEAL Hibiscus Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

3.5

Poor


ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6

Mixed to Positive


Reviews Comparison

FAAEAL Hibiscus (more reviews)

FAAEAL Hibiscus reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
Comment: Feels like the HZSound HM but not done that well. Bass-anemic low end, note weight is too light in the lower mids

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: D+ Mids: C Treble: C- Soundstage: C Details: C- Imaging: D+

FAAEAL Hibiscus reviewed by Crin

Crin 3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D+ Tech

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra (more reviews)

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
Great details and bass, so fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: B
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $38.99

Buy ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra on HiFiGO

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 5.5 * score rescaled + normalized

FAAEAL Hibiscus User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

FAAEAL Hibiscus Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.7

Gaming Grade

D+

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.2

Gaming Grade

C+

FAAEAL Hibiscus Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Bass D+
It hints at bass presence but never quite delivers satisfying punch. Percussion lacks a satisfying weight.
Mids C
The mids sound serviceable but rough around the edges, needing polish. Occasional glare can creep into upper mids.
Treble C-
Treble is adequate overall, though its texture can feel coarse. Longer sessions may expose grain.
Soundstage C
The mix opens sideways while remaining vertically compressed and front-to-back shallow. You'll notice crowding on busy tracks.
Details C-
The presentation is fine for casual listening but leaves refinement on the table. There's some grain on quieter elements.
Imaging D+
It sketches positions loosely while allowing outlines to blur. Instrument outlines remain fuzzy.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C+
Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.
Dynamics B
The performance feels robust, with satisfying punch and natural transitions. Nuances are easy to follow.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

FAAEAL Hibiscus User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer