FAAEAL Hibiscus - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (D Tier | 3.5/10)

IEMRanking.com Home FAAEAL Hibiscus

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin
Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

3.5

Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.7

Gaming Grade

D+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
Comment: Feels like the HZSound HM but not done that well. Bass-anemic low end, note weight is too light in the lower mids

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: D+ Mids: C Treble: C- Soundstage: C Details: C- Imaging: D+

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D+ Tech

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

FAAEAL Hibiscus Infos

Compare FAAEAL Hibiscus to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better soundstage, treble and mids.
5.8
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. KZ D-Fi
KZ D-Fi offers better imaging, bass and details.
5.7
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better bass, imaging and details.
5.5
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Kiwi Ears CADENZA
Kiwi Ears CADENZA offers better bass, mids and treble.
5.3
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Final Audio E2000
Similar overall performance.
5.3
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. 7HZ G1
7HZ G1 offers better soundstage and mids.
5.3
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. BLON x HBB Z300
BLON x HBB Z300 offers better bass.
5.1
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Moondrop Lan
Moondrop Lan offers better mids.
5
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. TinHifi C2 Mech Warrior
TinHifi C2 Mech Warrior offers better bass, treble and mids.
4.8
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Blon BL03
Blon BL03 offers better soundstage, bass and imaging.
4.5
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D+
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage C
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging D+
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer