FAAEAL Hibiscus Review & Ranking

Aggregated Scores from Top Experts & Community

IEMRanking.com Home FAAEAL Hibiscus

FAAEAL Hibiscus Average Reviewer Scores

Crin
Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

3.5

Negative

FAAEAL Hibiscus Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.7

Gaming Grade

D+

Reviews

FAAEAL Hibiscus reviewed by:

Crin 3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D+ Tech
check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

FAAEAL Hibiscus reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 4 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
Weaknesses: Bass-anemic low end, note weight is too light in the lower mids. Comment: Feels like the HZSound HM but not done that well.

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: D+ Mids: C Treble: C- Soundstage: C Details: C- Imaging: D+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

FAAEAL Hibiscus Infos

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D+
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage C
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging D+
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Top alternatives for FAAEAL Hibiscus

Write own User-Review for FAAEAL Hibiscus
Please to write User Reviews
IEM Comparison Tool new
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Be the first to share your experience!

Footer