IEMRanking.com
Home
FAAEAL Hibiscus
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.5Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.7Gaming Grade
D+FAAEAL Hibiscus Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: "Balanced"
Price (Msrp): $40
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
Comment: Feels like the HZSound HM but not done that well.
Bass-anemic low end, note weight is too light in the lower mids
Bass: D+
Mids: C
Treble: C-
Soundstage: C
Details: C-
Imaging: D+
Reviewed by: Crin
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
FAAEAL Hibiscus Infos
Compare FAAEAL Hibiscus to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better soundstage, treble and mids.
|
5.8 |
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. KZ D-Fi
KZ D-Fi offers better imaging, bass and details.
|
5.7 |
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better bass, imaging and details.
|
5.5 |
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Kiwi Ears CADENZA
Kiwi Ears CADENZA offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
5.3 |
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Final Audio E2000
Similar overall performance.
|
5.3 |
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. 7HZ G1
7HZ G1 offers better soundstage and mids.
|
5.3 |
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. BLON x HBB Z300
BLON x HBB Z300 offers better bass.
|
5.1 |
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Moondrop Lan
Moondrop Lan offers better mids.
|
5 |
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. TinHifi C2 Mech Warrior
TinHifi C2 Mech Warrior offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
4.8 |
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Blon BL03
Blon BL03 offers better soundstage, bass and imaging.
|
4.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D+- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D+- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D+
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage
C
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details
C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
D+
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming
D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review