FAAEAL Hibiscus - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (D Tier | 3.5/10)

Home FAAEAL Hibiscus

Summary

Based on 2 reviews, the FAAEAL Hibiscus is landing below average in reviewer sentiment, with few reports of standout moments.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

3.5

Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.7

Gaming Grade

D+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
Comment: Feels like the HZSound HM but not done that well. Bass-anemic low end, note weight is too light in the lower mids

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: D+ Mids: C Treble: C- Soundstage: C Details: C- Imaging: D+

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D+ Tech

FAAEAL Hibiscus Infos

Discuss FAAEAL Hibiscus with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "FAAEAL Hibiscus discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare FAAEAL Hibiscus to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough FAAEAL Hibiscus reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Kbear KB02
Kbear KB02 offers better bass, soundstage and mids.
6.4
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Moondrop Marigold
Moondrop Marigold offers better bass, imaging and mids.
6.2
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. HZSound Heart Mirror Zero
Similar overall performance.
6.2
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. 7HZ G1
7HZ G1 offers better soundstage and mids.
6.1
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better bass, imaging and details.
6
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better soundstage, treble and mids.
6
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. ARTTI R2
Similar overall performance.
6
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. KZ D-Fi
KZ D-Fi offers better imaging, bass and details.
5.7
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. EPZ G10
Similar overall performance.
5.5
FAAEAL Hibiscus vs. BLON BL-Max
Similar overall performance.
5.5
Best IEMs from below $50

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Bass D+
It hints at bass presence but never quite delivers satisfying punch. Percussion lacks a satisfying weight.
Mids C
The mids sound serviceable but rough around the edges, needing polish. Occasional glare can creep into upper mids.
Treble C-
Treble is adequate overall, though its texture can feel coarse. Longer sessions may expose grain.
Soundstage C
The mix opens sideways while remaining vertically compressed and front-to-back shallow. You'll notice crowding on busy tracks.
Details C-
The presentation is fine for casual listening but leaves refinement on the table. There's some grain on quieter elements.
Imaging D+
It sketches positions loosely while allowing outlines to blur. Instrument outlines remain fuzzy.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer