Fatfreq 20.6 and EPZ 530 use 6BA and 5BA driver setups respectively. Fatfreq 20.6 costs $810 while EPZ 530 costs $700. Fatfreq 20.6 is $110 more expensive. EPZ 530 holds a decisive 3.2-point edge in reviewer scores (4.5 vs 7.7).
Insights
Metric | Fatfreq 20.6 | EPZ 530 |
---|---|---|
Mids | 4.5 | 6 |
Treble | 4.5 | 6 |
Soundstage | 4.5 | 7 |
Dynamics | 4.5 | 7 |
Tonality | 4.5 | 7.3 |
Technicalities | 5.5 | 7 |
Fatfreq 20.6 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
EPZ 530 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Fatfreq 20.6 Details
Driver Configuration: 6BA
Tuning Type: Warm
Price (Msrp): $810
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
EPZ 530 Details
Driver Configuration: 5BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $700
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Fatfreq 20.6 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
EPZ 530 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Fatfreq 20.6 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.2Gaming Grade
C-EPZ 530 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.6Gaming Grade
B+Fatfreq 20.6 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
EPZ 530 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A-- Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.
Average Technical Grade
A-- Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Fatfreq 20.6 Reviews
check links for more info: Crin Youtube Channel
EPZ 530 Reviews
Great set for jazz/blues/soul/acoustic. Thick and lush. Warm but with nice treble extension. Solid tech. Vocals can be overly husky and buried in busier songs. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
It does some things very well. Very good item. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Fatfreq 20.6 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewEPZ 530 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review