Fatfreq 20.6 [4.5/10]

Reviews (1), scores and comparisons for Fatfreq 20.6

IEMRanking.com Home Fatfreq 20.6

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

Reviews

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
B- Tech
check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Fatfreq 20.6 Infos

Compare Fatfreq 20.6 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Fatfreq 20.6 vs. Softears RSV MK II
Similar overall performance.
8.3
Fatfreq 20.6 vs. Thieaudio Hype 10
Similar overall performance.
8.1
Fatfreq 20.6 vs. Letshuoer EJ07
Similar overall performance.
8
Fatfreq 20.6 vs. Thieaudio Origin
Similar overall performance.
7.8
Fatfreq 20.6 vs. Aful Cantor
Similar overall performance.
7.8
Fatfreq 20.6 vs. 7th Acoustics Supernova
Similar overall performance.
7.8
Fatfreq 20.6 vs. EPZ 530
Similar overall performance.
7.7
Fatfreq 20.6 vs. Softears Twilight
Similar overall performance.
7.6
Fatfreq 20.6 vs. Moondrop S8
Similar overall performance.
7.6
Fatfreq 20.6 vs. FlipEars Legion
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Best IEMs from $600 - $1,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer