Softears Twilight VS Fatfreq 20.6
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Softears Twilight and Fatfreq 20.6 use 1DD and 6BA driver setups respectively. Softears Twilight costs $930 while Fatfreq 20.6 costs $810. Softears Twilight is $120 more expensive. Softears Twilight holds a decisive 3.1-point edge in reviewer scores (7.6 vs 4.5).
Insights
| Metric | Softears Twilight | Fatfreq 20.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 7.5 | 4.5 |
| Mids | 8 | 4.5 |
| Treble | 7 | 4.5 |
| Soundstage | 8 | 4.5 |
| Dynamics | 5 | 4.5 |
| Tonality | 7.8 | 4.5 |
| Technicalities | 7.4 | 5.5 |
Softears Twilight Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Fatfreq 20.6 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Softears Twilight Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Warm
Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs
Price (Msrp): $930
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Fatfreq 20.6 Details
Driver Configuration: 6BA
Tuning Type: Warm
Price (Msrp): $810
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Softears Twilight User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Fatfreq 20.6 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Softears Twilight Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.5Gaming Grade
B+Fatfreq 20.6 Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.2Gaming Grade
C-Softears Twilight Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.
Average Technical Grade
A-- Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Fatfreq 20.6 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Softears Twilight Reviews
8.3
Reviewer Score
It's like a tubed iem, it's really fun. Something about DDs, so good. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
8
Reviewer Score
Slightly warm/neutral, very well balanced, good scaling, TOTL male vocals, big staging, wait for sale Jays Audio Youtube Channel
8
Reviewer Score
My top choice for timbral accuracy. Beautiful warm sound signature with outstanding timbre and an open sound. I wouldn’t change a thing.Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
7.7
Reviewer Score
check links for more info:Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking
Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
7
Reviewer Score
check links for more info: Crin Youtube Channel
6.5
Reviewer Score
Warm tuning done correct, one of my favorite single DD Need more treble Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Fatfreq 20.6 Reviews
4.5
Reviewer Score
check links for more info: Crin Youtube Channel
Softears Twilight User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFatfreq 20.6 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review