Fatfreq Reference VS Pula PA02
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Fatfreq Reference and Pula PA02 are in-ear monitors. Fatfreq Reference costs $150 while Pula PA02 costs $170. Pula PA02 is $20 more expensive. Pula PA02 holds a decisive 2.4-point edge in reviewer scores (4.5 vs 6.9).
Insights
| Metric | Fatfreq Reference | Pula PA02 |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 4.5 | 7 |
| Mids | 4.5 | 7 |
| Treble | 4.5 | 6.5 |
| Soundstage | 4.5 | 7 |
| Dynamics | 4.5 | 5 |
| Tonality | 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Technicalities | 4.5 | 6.6 |
Fatfreq Reference Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.5Generally Unfavorable
Pula PA02 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.9Cautiously Favorable
Reviews Comparison
Fatfreq Reference (more reviews)
Fatfreq Reference reviewed by Crin
4.5
Reviewer Score
Pula PA02 (more reviews)
Pula PA02 reviewed by Z-Reviews
8.5
* score normalized
Pula PA02 reviewed by Jaytiss
6.8
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Pula PA02 reviewed by Jays Audio
6.5
Reviewer Score
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Pula PA02 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel
6.5
Reviewer Score
Pula PA02 reviewed by Tim Tuned
6
Reviewer Score
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Fatfreq Reference Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: Neutral
Price (Msrp): $150
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Pula PA02 Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+3BA
Tuning Type: Neutral
Price (Msrp): $170
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Fatfreq Reference User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Pula PA02 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Fatfreq Reference Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.8Gaming Grade
CPula PA02 Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.6Gaming Grade
B+Fatfreq Reference Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B-- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Pula PA02 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Fatfreq Reference User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewPula PA02 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review