Softears Studio 4 VS FlipEars Aegis

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Softears Studio 4 and FlipEars Aegis use 4BA and 1DD+1BC driver setups respectively. Softears Studio 4 costs $450 while FlipEars Aegis costs $479. FlipEars Aegis is $29 more expensive. Softears Studio 4 holds a clear 0.6-point edge in reviewer scores (7.4 vs 6.9). FlipEars Aegis carries a user score of 8. FlipEars Aegis has significantly better bass with a 1.5-point edge, Softears Studio 4 has significantly better mids with a 1.8-point edge, Softears Studio 4 has better treble with a 0.8-point edge, FlipEars Aegis has significantly better dynamics with a 1.8-point edge, Softears Studio 4 has significantly better soundstage with a 3-point edge, FlipEars Aegis has significantly better details with a 2.5-point edge and FlipEars Aegis has significantly better imaging with a 2.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Softears Studio 4 FlipEars Aegis
Bass 6.5 8
Mids 7.3 5.5
Treble 7 6.3
Details 5 7.5
Soundstage 8 5
Imaging 5 7.5
Dynamics 5 6.8
Tonality 7.5 6.8
Technicalities 7.1 7

Softears Studio 4 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Jays Audio
Super* Review Tim Tuned Jaytiss Gizaudio Axel

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


FlipEars Aegis Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Jays Audio
Smirk Audio
IEMRanking AI

Average Reviewer Score:

6.9

Cautiously Favorable


Softears Studio 4 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

FlipEars Aegis User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

8

Very Positive

Softears Studio 4 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

FlipEars Aegis Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.7

Gaming Grade

B+

Softears Studio 4 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass B+
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging. Creates a truly three-dimensional space where instruments float naturally around you.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

FlipEars Aegis Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics B+
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details A
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Softears Studio 4 Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Softears Studio 4 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $449

Buy Softears Studio 4 on HiFiGO

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Just great all around, balance with amazingly clean midrange

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: S

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Something magical about this set, but it's not the Bass.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A Tech
A benchmark for tonality and timbre. Neutral, accurate sound with great bass, tonal accuracy, forward vocals, and natural timbre. Excellent isolation. Unvented design and BA bass may not suit everyone.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech
Best all rounder under $500. "Correct" and neutral tuning. Perfect vocals, not as forward like RSV but zero faults. Slight Improvement over RSV in-terms of seapration and stage size/treble is same/not as warm.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Sounds plasticky and smoothed; inoffensive to the point of being offensive.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C+

FlipEars Aegis Reviews

Reviewed by: Smirk Audio

2025-07-10
Smirk Audio 7.4 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech
check links for more info:

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A Dynamics: A Details: A Imaging: A

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech
Slight v-shape, but with less bass and low-end texture than Legion, more "balanced" and less engaging, but my unit was shouty and a bit sharp in the uppermids, also costs alot for what you can get at under $100.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Shouty, bad, needs EQ, fully MID.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: C+

Reviewed by: IEMRanking AI

IEMRanking AI 8.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech

The FlipEars Aegis delivers a visually stunning and sonically powerful experience, featuring hand-painted, medieval-inspired rose-brass faceplates that make each unit a unique work of art. Its hybrid driver configuration—combining a dynamic driver with FlipEars’ proprietary Earquake bone conduction driver—generates a thunderous, tactile bass response that dominates the low end without overwhelming the mids. Comfort and isolation are excellent despite the ornate design, and the package includes a premium 4.4mm balanced cable and versatile accessories.

Sound-wise, the Aegis excels with a holographic soundstage that creates an arena-like sense of space and depth, while its midrange remains articulate and richly textured. Vocals cut through the mix with natural presence, and instruments retain impressive separation even in complex tracks. The treble, though slightly relaxed, offers enough air and control to avoid fatigue, making it ideal for long listening sessions despite lacking sparkling energy.

At under $500, the Aegis is a phenomenal value, delivering technicalities that rival higher-priced competitors, particularly in bass physicality and stage immersion. Its slightly darker tuning prioritizes musical engagement over analytical sharpness, cementing it as a top choice for bass enthusiasts seeking refinement and grandeur.


Softears Studio 4 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

FlipEars Aegis User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Vairen
8

A near-classic under $500: delivers thrilling bass texture via bone conduction, lush mids, and cathedral-like staging—perfect for bassheads who refuse to sacrifice detail or build quality.

Tuning: S- Tech: A+ Bass: S Mids: S- Treble: A Dynamics: S- Soundstage: S- Details: A+ Imaging: A+
Pros
Exceptional bass depth and physicality with zero muddiness, holographic soundstage that feels massive, and stunning hand-painted design that looks far more expensive than its price.
Cons
Slightly dark treble lacks airiness for some genres, and larger shells may cause fit issues for small ears during extended use.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer