Juzear Clear VS KZ PRX

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Juzear Clear and KZ PRX are in-ear monitors. Juzear Clear costs $50 while KZ PRX costs $55. KZ PRX is $5 more expensive. Juzear Clear holds a decisive 1.6-point edge in reviewer scores (6.4 vs 4.7). KZ PRX carries a user score of 8.5. Juzear Clear has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge, Juzear Clear has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge and Juzear Clear has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Juzear Clear KZ PRX
Mids 5 5
Treble 4 1
Soundstage 6 5
Dynamics 5 2
Tonality 4.8 3.5
Technicalities 4 1
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Juzear Clear and KZ PRX reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Juzear Clear Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Head-Fi.org
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

6.4

Mixed to Positive


KZ PRX Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Audio Amigo
Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

4.7

Generally Unfavorable


Reviews Comparison

KZ PRX reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 3.5 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
E- Tech
Weird upper trebble is killing it for me, but it might be good for you.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: E- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: C+

Juzear Clear reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.3 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the JUZEAR CLEAR at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

KZ PRX reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.7 * score rescaled + normalized
8 community members have rated the KZ PRX at an average of 4.3/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Juzear Clear (more reviews)

Juzear Clear reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7 * score rescaled + normalized

KZ PRX (more reviews)

KZ PRX reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 4 * score rescaled + normalized
Best KZ Planar IEM. Warm, bassy sound, lacking a little in dynamics. Foam tips come worn down in the package. Shrill tonality in higher treble for some listeners

Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

Juzear Clear User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ PRX User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

8.5

Excellent

Juzear Clear Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

KZ PRX Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.8

Gaming Grade

E

Juzear Clear Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

KZ PRX Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • A foggy, one-dimensional presentation wipes out layering and obscures the finer points of a mix. Spatial cues barely register at all.
Mids C+
Midrange performance is decent, offering balanced presence without major flaws. It works well for casual background listening.
Treble E-
The top end feels muffled, with air and shimmer barely audible. Ambient reverb tails are chopped short.
Dynamics E+
Subtle shifts disappear, with transients lacking bite or urgency. Drum hits arrive without conviction.
Soundstage C+
You start to perceive distinct rows of players even if the ceiling still feels low. Layering is present but still modest.
Gaming E
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Juzear Clear User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

KZ PRX User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
yorxx
8.5

Harman Warm Tuning.

Tuning: S Tech: S Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: S Details: A- Imaging: S
Pros
Very good technically, Very good soundstage, warm, very good image.
Cons
poor build quality, poor nozzle quality, poor quality of accessories.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer