KZ PRX - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (C Tier | 4.7/10)

Home KZ PRX

Summary

Based on 3 reviews and 1 user rating, the KZ PRX is a situational pick according to reviewers, who suggest matching it carefully to individual tastes.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.7

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

8.5

Excellent

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.8

Gaming Grade

E

Reviews

Reviewed by: Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 4 * score rescaled + normalized
Best KZ Planar IEM. Warm, bassy sound, lacking a little in dynamics. Foam tips come worn down in the package. Shrill tonality in higher treble for some listeners

Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 3.5 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
E- Tech
Weird upper trebble is killing it for me, but it might be good for you.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: E- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: C+

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.7 * score rescaled + normalized
8 community members have rated the KZ PRX at an average of 4.3/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

KZ PRX Infos

Discuss KZ PRX with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "KZ PRX discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare KZ PRX to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough KZ PRX reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
KZ PRX vs. KZ Zenith
KZ Zenith offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
6.8
KZ PRX vs. KZ AM16
KZ AM16 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
6.8
KZ PRX vs. Sivga M300
Sivga M300 offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
6.6
KZ PRX vs. Tin Hifi C3 MK2
Tin Hifi C3 MK2 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
6.6
KZ PRX vs. Moondrop May
Moondrop May offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
6.5
KZ PRX vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
6.5
KZ PRX vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
6.4
KZ PRX vs. CCZ CZ10
CCZ CZ10 offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
6.4
KZ PRX vs. Astrotec GX100
Astrotec GX100 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
6.3
KZ PRX vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better treble and soundstage.
6.3
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • A foggy, one-dimensional presentation wipes out layering and obscures the finer points of a mix. Spatial cues barely register at all.
Mids C+
Midrange performance is decent, offering balanced presence without major flaws. It works well for casual background listening.
Treble E-
The top end feels muffled, with air and shimmer barely audible. Ambient reverb tails are chopped short.
Dynamics E+
Subtle shifts disappear, with transients lacking bite or urgency. Drum hits arrive without conviction.
Soundstage C+
You start to perceive distinct rows of players even if the ceiling still feels low. Layering is present but still modest.
Gaming E
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Y yorxx
8.5

Harman Warm Tuning.

Tuning: S Tech: S Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: S Details: A- Imaging: S
Pros
Very good technically, Very good soundstage, warm, very good image.
Cons
poor build quality, poor nozzle quality, poor quality of accessories.

Footer