Juzear Clear VS KZ PRX

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Juzear Clear and KZ PRX are in-ear monitors. Juzear Clear costs $50 while KZ PRX costs $55. KZ PRX is $5 more expensive. Juzear Clear holds a decisive 2.9-point edge in reviewer scores (6.4 vs 3.5). KZ PRX carries a user score of 8.5. Juzear Clear has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge, Juzear Clear has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge and Juzear Clear has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Juzear Clear KZ PRX
Mids 5 5
Treble 4 1
Soundstage 6 5
Dynamics 5 2
Tonality 4.8 3.5
Technicalities 4 1

Juzear Clear Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

6.4

Mixed to Positive


KZ PRX Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

3.5

Poor


Reviews Comparison

KZ PRX reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 3.5 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
E- Tech
Weird upper trebble is killing it for me, but it might be good for you.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: E- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: C+

Juzear Clear (more reviews)

Juzear Clear reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7 * score normalized

Juzear Clear User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ PRX User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

8.5

Excellent

Juzear Clear Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

KZ PRX Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.8

Gaming Grade

E

Juzear Clear Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

KZ PRX Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble E-
Treble is extremely rolled off and veiled. High frequencies are barely perceptible with significant loss of detail.
Dynamics E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Gaming E
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Juzear Clear User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

KZ PRX User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
yorxx
8.5

Harman Warm Tuning.

Tuning: S Tech: S Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: S Details: A- Imaging: S
Pros
Very good technically, Very good soundstage, warm, very good image.
Cons
poor build quality, poor nozzle quality, poor quality of accessories.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer