Kefine Delci VS KZ PRX

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Kefine Delci and KZ PRX are in-ear monitors. Kefine Delci costs $59 while KZ PRX costs $55. Kefine Delci is $4 more expensive. Kefine Delci holds a decisive 2.5-point edge in reviewer scores (6 vs 3.5). KZ PRX carries a user score of 8.5. Kefine Delci has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge, Kefine Delci has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge and Kefine Delci has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Kefine Delci KZ PRX
Mids 5 5
Treble 4 1
Soundstage 6 5
Dynamics 5 2
Tonality 6.2 3.5
Technicalities 5.2 1

Kefine Delci Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Jays Audio
Gizaudio Axel
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

6

Mixed to Positive


KZ PRX Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

3.5

Poor


Reviews Comparison

KZ PRX reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 3.5 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
E- Tech
Weird upper trebble is killing it for me, but it might be good for you.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: E- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: C+

Kefine Delci (more reviews)

Kefine Delci reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7.5 * score normalized

Kefine Delci reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 6 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B- Tech

Kefine Delci reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
A warmer/less sharp EW200, a slightly more resolving BLON Z300, price might be an issue tho

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Kefine Delci User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ PRX User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

8.5

Excellent

Kefine Delci Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

KZ PRX Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.8

Gaming Grade

E

Kefine Delci Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

KZ PRX Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble E-
Treble is extremely rolled off and veiled. High frequencies are barely perceptible with significant loss of detail.
Dynamics E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Gaming E
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Kefine Delci User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

KZ PRX User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
yorxx
8.5

Harman Warm Tuning.

Tuning: S Tech: S Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: S Details: A- Imaging: S
Pros
Very good technically, Very good soundstage, warm, very good image.
Cons
poor build quality, poor nozzle quality, poor quality of accessories.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer