KBear Rosefinch VS TangZu Wan'er S.G

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

KBear Rosefinch and TangZu Wan'er S.G are in-ear monitors. KBear Rosefinch costs $20 while TangZu Wan'er S.G costs $21. TangZu Wan'er S.G is $1 more expensive. TangZu Wan'er S.G holds a decisive 1.3-point edge in reviewer scores (4 vs 5.3). TangZu Wan'er S.G carries a user score of 5.

Insights

Metric KBear Rosefinch TangZu Wan'er S.G
Bass 4 5.3
Mids 4 5.6
Treble 4 4.5
Details 4 4
Soundstage 4 5.5
Imaging 4 4.3
Dynamics 4 2
Tonality 7 5.6
Technicalities 4.5 4.8
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough KBear Rosefinch reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

KBear Rosefinch Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

4

Unfavorable

TangZu Wan'er S.G Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz
Jaytiss Jays Audio
Gizaudio Axel Tim Tuned Shuwa-T
Kois Archive Audio Amigo Super* Review Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

5.3

Mixed to Negative

Reviews Comparison

KBear Rosefinch reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
C Tech
Best budget basshead set. Crap ton of bass. Slams like a truck. Amazing bass weight and impact.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Basically the modded Zero with slight more bass. Most vocal forward out of the $20 sets.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

Buy TangZu Wan'er S.G on Linsoul

Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your TangZu Wan'er S.G or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $20

Buy TangZu Wan'er S.G on Linsoul

TangZu Wan'er S.G (more reviews)

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 6.4 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B Tech
Rating: B- | Value: ⭐⭐⭐ | Comfort: 10 solid tuning driver quality could be better

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 6 * score rescaled + normalized
Budget pick for J-Pop and Female Vocals. Good Bass. Lacking some detail

Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 5.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
C Tech
check links for more info:

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Can't believe this is $20.... Details is only okay

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A-

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Comment: It's literally $20, recommended to buy when starting out or as a beater set. Probably the most balanced sounding at its price Average tech like its other counterparts, bass is less controlled

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C+ Mids: B- Treble: C- Soundstage: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: B-

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
I just bought and reevaluated, such a bad experience.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: B

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 3.4 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
D Tech
Solid tuning that could use more extension in the upper region, but a very solid pick for its price.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: D Details: D Imaging: D

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.7 * score rescaled + normalized
8 community members have rated the TangZu Wan'er S.G at an average of 4.3/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Buy TangZu Wan'er S.G on HiFiGO

Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your TangZu Wan'er S.G or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $20

Buy TangZu Wan'er S.G on HiFiGO

KBear Rosefinch User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

TangZu Wan'er S.G User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

5

Mixed to Negative

KBear Rosefinch Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

TangZu Wan'er S.G Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

KBear Rosefinch Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • The tonal character feels settled and versatile, with just a few gentle bumps. You can listen for hours without fatigue.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Resolution is limited, masking finer nuances and narrowing the soundstage. Busy mixes still overwhelm it with ease.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

TangZu Wan'er S.G Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • It sounds pleasant overall, with some uneven spots that hint at room for refinement. Vocals remain pleasant despite the imperfections.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass C+
It delivers adequate punch and texture, though nothing stands out. Sub-bass presence is hinted rather than delivered.
Mids B-
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics E+
Dynamic range feels limited, smearing micro-contrast and transient attack. Soft details are smoothed into the background.
Soundstage B-
It pushes sound outward confidently while leaving height development as an unfinished idea. Height remains subtle but detectable.
Details C-
The presentation is fine for casual listening but leaves refinement on the table. There's some grain on quieter elements.
Imaging C-
Separation is good enough for casual listening yet misses audiophile precision. Depth remains limited but present.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

KBear Rosefinch User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

TangZu Wan'er S.G User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
W wpzdm
5

Gave to my wife

Pros
Good for its price
Cons
Feels muddy. Vocal a bit siblant

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer