KZ PRX VS Apos x Community Rock Lobster

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

KZ PRX and Apos x Community Rock Lobster are in-ear monitors. KZ PRX costs $55 while Apos x Community Rock Lobster costs $60. Apos x Community Rock Lobster is $5 more expensive. Apos x Community Rock Lobster holds a decisive 1.6-point edge in reviewer scores (4.7 vs 6.3). KZ PRX carries a user score of 8.5. Apos x Community Rock Lobster has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, Apos x Community Rock Lobster has significantly better treble with a 4-point edge, Apos x Community Rock Lobster has significantly better dynamics with a 5-point edge and Apos x Community Rock Lobster has significantly better soundstage with a 1.4-point edge.

Insights

Metric KZ PRX Apos x Community Rock Lobster
Mids 5 6
Treble 1 5
Soundstage 5 6.4
Dynamics 2 7
Tonality 3.5 6.1
Technicalities 1 5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough KZ PRX and Apos x Community Rock Lobster reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

KZ PRX Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Audio Amigo
Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

4.7

Generally Unfavorable


Apos x Community Rock Lobster Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive


Reviews Comparison

KZ PRX reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 3.5 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
E- Tech
Weird upper trebble is killing it for me, but it might be good for you.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: E- Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: C+

Apos x Community Rock Lobster reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-10-11
Jaytiss 7.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
Has some slight colorizations, but is fun and rich.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B

KZ PRX (more reviews)

KZ PRX reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 4 * score rescaled + normalized
Best KZ Planar IEM. Warm, bassy sound, lacking a little in dynamics. Foam tips come worn down in the package. Shrill tonality in higher treble for some listeners

Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

KZ PRX reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.7 * score rescaled + normalized
8 community members have rated the KZ PRX at an average of 4.3/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Apos x Community Rock Lobster (more reviews)

Apos x Community Rock Lobster reviewed by Z-Reviews

2025-10-13
Z-Reviews 5.5 * score rescaled + normalized

KZ PRX User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

8.5

Excellent

Apos x Community Rock Lobster User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ PRX Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.8

Gaming Grade

E

Apos x Community Rock Lobster Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

KZ PRX Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • A foggy, one-dimensional presentation wipes out layering and obscures the finer points of a mix. Spatial cues barely register at all.
Mids C+
Midrange performance is decent, offering balanced presence without major flaws. It works well for casual background listening.
Treble E-
The top end feels muffled, with air and shimmer barely audible. Ambient reverb tails are chopped short.
Dynamics E+
Subtle shifts disappear, with transients lacking bite or urgency. Drum hits arrive without conviction.
Soundstage C+
You start to perceive distinct rows of players even if the ceiling still feels low. Layering is present but still modest.
Gaming E
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Apos x Community Rock Lobster Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Mids B
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics A-
The system snaps into action with precision, highlighting every swell. Recordings feel energetic and alive.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

KZ PRX User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
yorxx
8.5

Harman Warm Tuning.

Tuning: S Tech: S Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: S Details: A- Imaging: S
Pros
Very good technically, Very good soundstage, warm, very good image.
Cons
poor build quality, poor nozzle quality, poor quality of accessories.

Apos x Community Rock Lobster User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer