KZ ZAS VS EarAcoustic STA Pro Max

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

KZ ZAS and EarAcoustic STA Pro Max use 1DD+7BA and 2DD (10mm LCP+6mm Ti-plated) driver setups respectively. KZ ZAS costs $75 while EarAcoustic STA Pro Max costs $80. EarAcoustic STA Pro Max is $5 more expensive. EarAcoustic STA Pro Max holds a decisive 2-point edge in reviewer scores (4.6 vs 6.5). EarAcoustic STA Pro Max has significantly better bass with a 3.6-point edge, EarAcoustic STA Pro Max has significantly better mids with a 2.9-point edge, EarAcoustic STA Pro Max has significantly better treble with a 4-point edge, EarAcoustic STA Pro Max has significantly better dynamics with a 3.2-point edge, EarAcoustic STA Pro Max has significantly better details with a 2.8-point edge and EarAcoustic STA Pro Max has significantly better imaging with a 2.8-point edge.

Insights

Metric KZ ZAS EarAcoustic STA Pro Max
Bass 3 6.6
Mids 3 5.9
Treble 2 6
Details 3 5.8
Soundstage 4.6 5.7
Imaging 3 5.8
Dynamics 3 6.2
Tonality 2.7 6.7
Technicalities 3 6.5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough KZ ZAS and EarAcoustic STA Pro Max reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

KZ ZAS Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.6

Generally Unfavorable


EarAcoustic STA Pro Max Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.5

Cautiously Favorable


Reviews Comparison

KZ ZAS (more reviews)

KZ ZAS reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 2.9 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
D Tech
Typical bloated KZ tuning. The party doesn't stop, I guess.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: E+ Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

KZ ZAS reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.2 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the KZ ZAS at an average of 3.4/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Cautiously Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

EarAcoustic STA Pro Max (more reviews)

EarAcoustic STA Pro Max reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 6.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Rating: B+ | Value: ⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮 | Comfort: 9 great warm tuning oddities in the treble

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your EarAcoustic STA Pro Max or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $79

Buy EarAcoustic STA Pro Max on Linsoul

EarAcoustic STA Pro Max reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 6.3 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
B- Tuning
B- Tech
STA Pro pushes upper mids/treble and loses the Pro Max's bassy fun and resolution. Go with the Pro Max. Sturdy build with an attractive faceplate and a dual-DD concept at a more affordable price. Brighter tuning masks the bass, with lower resolution and scaling that trails the Pro Max.
Youtube Video Summary

STA Pro keeps the dual dynamic recipe but swaps to 10 mm + 6 mm composite diaphragms instead of the Pro Max's LCP and titanium-plated combo. Build is similarly solid—arguably flashier on the faceplate—yet the driver change shifts the character in ways that don't mirror the Max.

While the bass shelf remains, the Pro adds more upper mids and a touch more treble, pulling focus from the low end and dulling the TFZ-style, big-bass fun that made the Max engaging. The attempt to "poke in" extra presence for detail doesn't convert into true clarity; the balance turns brighter and less relaxed.

Technicalities trail the Max: less resolution, less perceived detail, and it doesn't volume scale the same way, coming across as a more affordable, less refined variant. For this line, the smarter buy remains the STA Pro Max with the LCP + titanium drivers; the base STA Pro simply doesn't reach the same level.

Bass: B Mids: B- Treble: B Details: B-

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

EarAcoustic STA Pro Max reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 6.4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B- Tech

The EarAcoustic STA Pro Max is a dual-dynamic IEM using a 10 mm LCP diaphragm paired with a 6 mm titanium-plated dynamic driver (2DD). Retail listings also show basic specs of ~110 dB sensitivity, 30 Ω impedance and a stated 10–30 kHz range, placing it in the easy-to-drive, budget category; Linsoul currently lists the Max variant at ~$79.90. A broader product overview from HiFiGo confirms the STA series’ 2DD (10 mm+6 mm) architecture and differentiates models by diaphragm materials, with the Max positioned as the LCP/titanium option.

Community impressions characterize the STA Pro Max as a bassy, V-shaped tuning with a mid-bass-dominant profile and generally lush/smooth mids, trading ultimate neutrality for warmth and fun. These notes align with reports that it delivers thicker note weight rather than maximum treble air, which suits pop and hip-hop more than critical, mid-centric listening.

Technicalities are serviceable for the price: dynamics have some punch from the mid-bass lift, but detail retrieval and stage/imaging are average and can feel compact on busy mixes. On the upside, the 30 Ω/110 dB spec makes it straightforward to drive from a phone dongle, and the 2-pin connection eases cable rolling. Overall, at ~<$100 it offers a warm, bass-forward presentation that prioritizes musical weight over forensic resolution; value is solid, but it doesn’t challenge class leaders on technical performance.


Bass: A- Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: B Soundstage: B- Details: B- Imaging: B-

KZ ZAS User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EarAcoustic STA Pro Max User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ ZAS Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.9

Gaming Grade

D-

EarAcoustic STA Pro Max Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.6

Gaming Grade

B+

KZ ZAS Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D-
  • Expect a discordant presentation where frequency clashes ruin any chance of relaxed listening. It struggles to render a cohesive musical picture.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Bass D
Bass remains light-handed, hinting at rumble without delivering real weight. It keeps out of the way but never excites.
Mids D
The region feels unstable, alternating between honky resonance and missing information. You'll hear odd resonances across the mids.
Treble E+
Expect a dark-tilted treble that keeps excitement in check. Sibilants are dull, but so is everything else.
Dynamics D
Dynamics sound noticeably compressed, muting contrast between quiet and loud. Transients feel blunted and slow.
Details D
Modest detail presentation that sacrifices texture and masks subtle nuances. It conveys the basics but not the nuance.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning that never quite nails the center image. Left/right cues exist but are rough.
Gaming D-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

EarAcoustic STA Pro Max Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Bass B+
Expect a solid thump that keeps the rhythm engaging yet controlled. Sub-bass presence is supportive, not overwhelming.
Mids B-
The region sounds agreeable overall, delivering clarity without flashiness. Slight warmth keeps things easy-going.
Treble B
The top end is engaging and airy, yet never overbearing. Brass and strings feel energetic.
Dynamics B
Dynamic expression is good, delivering solid impact and convincing contrast. Percussion lands with convincing weight.
Soundstage B-
The image breathes a little, spacing instruments laterally while sketching a light sense of distance. Separation improves with cleaner recordings.
Details B-
Decent detail retrieval that handles most textures while leaving some micro-information understated. Most textures come through cleanly.
Imaging B-
The stage feels orderly, guiding your ear across positions without confusion. Depth layering is hinted and believable.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.

KZ ZAS User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

EarAcoustic STA Pro Max User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer