KZ ZAS - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (D Tier | 2.9/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
KZ ZAS
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
2.9Very Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
2.9Gaming Grade
D-KZ ZAS Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+7BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs
Price (Msrp): $75
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Precogvision
2.9
Reviewer Score
D-
Tuning
D
Tech
Typical bloated KZ tuning. The party doesn't stop, I guess.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: D
Treble: E+
Dynamics: D
Details: D
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
KZ ZAS Infos
Compare KZ ZAS to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
KZ ZAS vs. Kiwi Ears CANTA
Kiwi Ears CANTA offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
6.5 |
|
KZ ZAS vs. Moondrop May
Moondrop May offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
6.5 |
|
KZ ZAS vs. Tanchjim 4U
Similar overall performance.
|
6.4 |
|
KZ ZAS vs. Simgot EW300
Similar overall performance.
|
6.3 |
|
KZ ZAS vs. Simgot EA500LM
Simgot EA500LM offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
6.3 |
|
KZ ZAS vs. Moondrop Aria 2
Moondrop Aria 2 offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
6.2 |
|
KZ ZAS vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better mids and treble.
|
6.2 |
|
KZ ZAS vs. Pula Unicrom
Pula Unicrom offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6.1 |
|
KZ ZAS vs. Truthear Pure
Truthear Pure offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
6.1 |
|
KZ ZAS vs. Truthear Hexa
Truthear Hexa offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
6.1 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D-- Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.
Average Technical Grade
D- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details
D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming
D-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review