KZ Zex VS CCA Phoenix

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

KZ Zex and CCA Phoenix are in-ear monitors. KZ Zex costs $25 while CCA Phoenix costs $29. CCA Phoenix is $4 more expensive. CCA Phoenix holds a decisive 3.3-point edge in reviewer scores (3.3 vs 6.6). CCA Phoenix has significantly better bass with a 3.8-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better mids with a 2.6-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better treble with a 2.8-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better details with a 3.8-point edge and CCA Phoenix has significantly better imaging with a 3.2-point edge.

Insights

Metric KZ Zex CCA Phoenix
Bass 3 6.8
Mids 3 5.6
Treble 3 5.8
Details 3 6.8
Soundstage 3.3 6.3
Imaging 3 6.2
Dynamics 3 5
Tonality 3.4 5.4
Technicalities 4 6.5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough KZ Zex and CCA Phoenix reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

KZ Zex Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Kois Archive Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

3.3

Very Poor

CCA Phoenix Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Paul Wasabii

Average Reviewer Score:

6.6

Cautiously Favorable

Reviews Comparison

KZ Zex (more reviews)

KZ Zex reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score rescaled + normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

KZ Zex reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 3 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Rating: F- | Comfort: 8 not too balanced

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

KZ Zex reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Warm and gooey but with too much spice in the mid-treble.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

CCA Phoenix (more reviews)

CCA Phoenix reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.6 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B Tech
It's a nice easy set, fun and enjoyable.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: B Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B+
YouTube video thumbnail

Buy CCA Phoenix on Linsoul

Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your CCA Phoenix or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $29

Buy CCA Phoenix on Linsoul

CCA Phoenix reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 6.6 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
C+ Tuning
B+ Tech
YouTube video thumbnail
Strong LCP driver with tight mid bass and clear mids, but upper mids and treble run hot above Harman; best at low volume or with EQ. Excellent value once dialed in. Fast and controlled driver with engaging mid bass, clear mids, and strong extension for the price. Upper mids and treble are too elevated, flattening stage and requiring EQ or low volume to avoid glare.
Youtube Video Summary

CCA Phoenix marks a fresh start under ND Audio with a polished metal shell, normal 2-pin socket, improved accessories, and a budget LCP single dynamic driver. On the graph it rides above the Harman target from the upper mids through treble, which reads bright at higher volume; low-volume listening is more agreeable. The driver quality is the story: fast, controlled, and unusually clean for the price, and with a touch of EQ it shows notably better clarity and composure.

Bass is a tilted profile with less sub-bass and a modest mid-bass lift, giving a tight, bouncy punch that suits pop, EDM, and hip-hop. The leaner shelf reveals the mids with good separation and minimal bloom, while the treble extends strongly but is too energetic in the 3–7 k region, flattening stage at louder levels. Trim the 3–20 k region by about 2 dB and staging gains dimension and imaging snaps into place. As a sub-30 USD set for tinkerers, Phoenix is a standout driver held back by hot tuning out of the box.

Bass: B+ Mids: B Treble: B- Soundstage: B Details: B+ Imaging: B

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

KZ Zex User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

CCA Phoenix User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ Zex Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.8

Gaming Grade

D+

CCA Phoenix Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.9

Gaming Grade

B-

KZ Zex Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Resolution is limited, masking finer nuances and narrowing the soundstage. Busy mixes still overwhelm it with ease.
Bass D
Bass remains light-handed, hinting at rumble without delivering real weight. It keeps out of the way but never excites.
Mids D
Expect a rollercoaster midrange where coloration constantly distracts. Complex vocals turn metallic and unnatural.
Treble D
Treble balance wavers, creating a mix of recessed detail and harsh flashes. Highs feel restless and unfocused.
Dynamics D
Expect a limited dynamic swing that keeps musical climaxes from hitting hard. Volume gradations feel artificially restrained.
Details D
Textural clues dull down, robbing strings and vocals of their natural grit. You hear outlines rather than textures.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning that never quite nails the center image. Left/right cues exist but are rough.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

CCA Phoenix Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Bass B+
The bass brings healthy impact, complementing mixes without overpowering them. It keeps up with faster passages cleanly.
Mids B-
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble B-
Treble feels agreeable overall, bringing sparkle without significant fatigue. You get a polite sense of air.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Details B+
Recordings feel well sorted, with supporting details snapping to attention. Small articulations remain intact.
Imaging B
Instrument boundaries feel well carved, avoiding smear or drift. Instrument outlines feel well-defined.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

KZ Zex User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

CCA Phoenix User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer