KZ Zex [3.5/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for KZ Zex

IEMRanking.com Home KZ Zex

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

3.5

Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3

Gaming Grade

D

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score normalized

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Warm and gooey but with too much spice in the mid-treble.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

KZ Zex Infos

Compare KZ Zex to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
KZ Zex vs. 7Hz Elua Ultra
7Hz Elua Ultra offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6.7
KZ Zex vs. Moondrop Crescent
Similar overall performance.
6.3
KZ Zex vs. 7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle
7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle offers better mids and dynamics.
6.1
KZ Zex vs. Tanchjim Bunny
Tanchjim Bunny offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
6
KZ Zex vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Black
Similar overall performance.
5.8
KZ Zex vs. Final Audio E500
Final Audio E500 offers better mids, bass and imaging.
5.5
KZ Zex vs. Ziigaat Nuo
Ziigaat Nuo offers better mids and dynamics.
5.4
KZ Zex vs. Tanchjim One
Tanchjim One offers better imaging, bass and details.
5.4
KZ Zex vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Abyss
Kinera Celest Wyvern Abyss offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
5.4
KZ Zex vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Kiwi Ears Dolce offers better mids and dynamics.
5.3
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer