KZ ZSN Pro VS CCA Phoenix

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

KZ ZSN Pro and CCA Phoenix are in-ear monitors. KZ ZSN Pro costs $25 while CCA Phoenix costs $29. CCA Phoenix is $4 more expensive. CCA Phoenix holds a decisive 2-point edge in reviewer scores (4.7 vs 6.6). CCA Phoenix has significantly better bass with a 3.3-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better mids with a 3.6-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better treble with a 2.8-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better soundstage with a 3.3-point edge, CCA Phoenix has significantly better details with a 2.3-point edge and CCA Phoenix has significantly better imaging with a 2.2-point edge.

Insights

Metric KZ ZSN Pro CCA Phoenix
Bass 3.5 6.8
Mids 2 5.6
Treble 3 5.8
Details 4.5 6.8
Soundstage 3 6.3
Imaging 4 6.2
Dynamics 4.7 5
Tonality 2.8 5.4
Technicalities 3.8 6.5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough KZ ZSN Pro and CCA Phoenix reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

KZ ZSN Pro Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.7

Generally Unfavorable


CCA Phoenix Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.6

Cautiously Favorable


Reviews Comparison

KZ ZSN Pro (more reviews)

KZ ZSN Pro reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized

KZ ZSN Pro reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 3.3 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
D+ Tech
Comment: Well at least it fits pretty nicely. Just no Tonally off, technically limited

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: D+ Mids: E+ Treble: D Soundstage: D Details: C Imaging: C-

CCA Phoenix (more reviews)

CCA Phoenix reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.6 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B Tech
It's a nice easy set, fun and enjoyable.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: B Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B+
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your CCA Phoenix or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $29

Buy CCA Phoenix on Linsoul

CCA Phoenix reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 6.6 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
C+ Tuning
B+ Tech
Strong LCP driver with tight mid bass and clear mids, but upper mids and treble run hot above Harman; best at low volume or with EQ. Excellent value once dialed in. Fast and controlled driver with engaging mid bass, clear mids, and strong extension for the price. Upper mids and treble are too elevated, flattening stage and requiring EQ or low volume to avoid glare.
Youtube Video Summary

CCA Phoenix marks a fresh start under ND Audio with a polished metal shell, normal 2-pin socket, improved accessories, and a budget LCP single dynamic driver. On the graph it rides above the Harman target from the upper mids through treble, which reads bright at higher volume; low-volume listening is more agreeable. The driver quality is the story: fast, controlled, and unusually clean for the price, and with a touch of EQ it shows notably better clarity and composure.

Bass is a tilted profile with less sub-bass and a modest mid-bass lift, giving a tight, bouncy punch that suits pop, EDM, and hip-hop. The leaner shelf reveals the mids with good separation and minimal bloom, while the treble extends strongly but is too energetic in the 3–7 k region, flattening stage at louder levels. Trim the 3–20 k region by about 2 dB and staging gains dimension and imaging snaps into place. As a sub-30 USD set for tinkerers, Phoenix is a standout driver held back by hot tuning out of the box.

Bass: B+ Mids: B Treble: B- Soundstage: B Details: B+ Imaging: B

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

KZ ZSN Pro User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

CCA Phoenix User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ ZSN Pro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.5

Gaming Grade

D+

CCA Phoenix Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

KZ ZSN Pro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D-
  • Expect a discordant presentation where frequency clashes ruin any chance of relaxed listening. It struggles to render a cohesive musical picture.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Bass D+
Bass remains light-handed, hinting at rumble without delivering real weight. It keeps out of the way but never excites.
Mids E+
The mids come across papery and weak, draining warmth from the mix. Acoustic tracks sound brittle and distant.
Treble D
Treble response is uneven, jumping between dull spots and sharp peaks. Peaks poke out unpredictably.
Soundstage D
A small, boxy image grants a hint of stereo movement yet refuses to extend outward or upward. Front/back layering is virtually flat.
Details C
The presentation is fine for casual listening but leaves refinement on the table. There's some grain on quieter elements.
Imaging C-
Depth hints are present though they rarely extend far beyond the stage front. Movement effects are understandable.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

CCA Phoenix Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Bass B+
The bass brings healthy impact, complementing mixes without overpowering them. It keeps up with faster passages cleanly.
Mids B-
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble B-
Treble feels agreeable overall, bringing sparkle without significant fatigue. You get a polite sense of air.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Details B+
Recordings feel well sorted, with supporting details snapping to attention. Small articulations remain intact.
Imaging B
Instrument boundaries feel well carved, avoiding smear or drift. Instrument outlines feel well-defined.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

KZ ZSN Pro User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

CCA Phoenix User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer