KZ ZSN Pro - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (C Tier | 4.7/10)

IEMRanking.com Home KZ ZSN Pro

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

4.7

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.5

Gaming Grade

D+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score normalized

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 3.3 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
D+ Tech
Comment: Well at least it fits pretty nicely. Just no Tonally off, technically limited

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: D+ Mids: E+ Treble: D Soundstage: D Details: C Imaging: C-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

KZ ZSN Pro Infos

Compare KZ ZSN Pro to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
KZ ZSN Pro vs. 7Hz Elua Ultra
7Hz Elua Ultra offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
6.7
KZ ZSN Pro vs. Moondrop Crescent
Similar overall performance.
6.3
KZ ZSN Pro vs. 7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle
7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle offers better mids and soundstage.
6.1
KZ ZSN Pro vs. Tanchjim Bunny
Tanchjim Bunny offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
6
KZ ZSN Pro vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Black
Similar overall performance.
5.8
KZ ZSN Pro vs. Final Audio E500
Final Audio E500 offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
5.5
KZ ZSN Pro vs. Tanchjim One
Tanchjim One offers better soundstage, bass and treble.
5.4
KZ ZSN Pro vs. Ziigaat Nuo
Ziigaat Nuo offers better mids and soundstage.
5.4
KZ ZSN Pro vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Abyss
Kinera Celest Wyvern Abyss offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
5.4
KZ ZSN Pro vs. Tangzu Waner 2
Tangzu Waner 2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
5.3
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D-
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D+
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids E+
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Soundstage D
Modest soundstage that feels confined. Some left/right separation but completely lacks depth and height dimensions.
Details C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer