Moondrop Nekocake VS ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Moondrop Nekocake and ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra are in-ear monitors. Moondrop Nekocake costs $43 while ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra costs $43. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra holds a decisive 1.5-point edge in reviewer scores (4.3 vs 5.8). ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge and ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better soundstage with a 1.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Moondrop Nekocake ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
Bass 4 5.8
Mids 5 5
Treble 4 5
Details 4.5 5.8
Soundstage 4.5 6
Imaging 4 5.8
Dynamics 4.3 6
Tonality 4.7 5
Technicalities 4.4 5

Moondrop Nekocake Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Crin Shuwa-T Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

4.3

Unfavorable


ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed


Moondrop Nekocake User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Moondrop Nekocake Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.5

Gaming Grade

C

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Moondrop Nekocake Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage C
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Moondrop Nekocake Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C Tech

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
Comment: Decent midrange and vocals. Price for ANC TWS unit that isn't bass boosted Technical performance is subpar

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C- Soundstage: C Details: C Imaging: C-

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score normalized

Moondrop Nekocake User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer