Moondrop Quarks 2 VS KZ Duonic

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Moondrop Quarks 2 and KZ Duonic use 1x Dynamic (7.8mm) and 1DD+1Planar driver setups respectively. Moondrop Quarks 2 costs $17 while KZ Duonic costs $20. KZ Duonic is $3 more expensive. KZ Duonic holds a clear 0.7-point edge in reviewer scores (4.9 vs 5.6). KZ Duonic has significantly better bass with a 1.8-point edge, KZ Duonic has better treble with a 0.5-point edge, KZ Duonic has significantly better dynamics with a 1.2-point edge, KZ Duonic has significantly better soundstage with a 1.3-point edge, KZ Duonic has significantly better details with a 1.1-point edge and KZ Duonic has better imaging with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Moondrop Quarks 2 KZ Duonic
Bass 5 6.8
Mids 6.2 6.1
Treble 5.2 5.7
Details 5.1 6.2
Soundstage 5 6.3
Imaging 5.6 6.1
Dynamics 5 6.2
Tonality 5.9 6.2
Technicalities 5.4 5.6
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Moondrop Quarks 2 and KZ Duonic reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Moondrop Quarks 2 Aggregated Review Score

IEMR Normalized Score

IEMR Normalized Score

4.9

Generally Unfavorable

Reviewer Average Score

5.2

Mixed to Negative


KZ Duonic Aggregated Review Score

IEMR Normalized Score

IEMR Normalized Score

5.6

Mixed

Reviewer Average Score

6.4

Mixed to Positive


Reviews Comparison

Moondrop Quarks 2 (more reviews)

Moondrop Quarks 2 reviewed by ATechReviews

ATechReviews 5.9 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
B Tuning
B- Tech
Moondrop Quark 2 offers excellent isolation, clean balanced tuning and strong value from its built in USB C DAC at around 17 USD, though bass slam and overall technical performance remain a step behind the Moondrop Chu II. Outstanding isolation, comfortable ultra light shells and durable USB C cable with integrated DAC and mic at a very low price. Bass impact and overall technical performance are clearly weaker than on the Moondrop Chu II and the fixed cable and strong seal may not suit all listeners.
Youtube Video Summary

Moondrop Quark 2 is a very affordable pair of IEMs around 17 USD that focuses on practicality, combining a fixed USB C cable with an integrated DAC, mic and simple bullet shaped shells. Build feels surprisingly solid for the price, with a sturdy USB C plug that inspires confidence and a light, comfortable fit that can be worn straight down or over ear. Isolation is a major highlight: the seal is so strong that office noise, fans and even mechanical keyboard clatter are largely blocked out, making this a compelling option for commuting or noisy environments, although potential pressure build up should be kept in mind for sensitive users.

On the tuning side Quark 2 delivers a smooth and safe response with a sub bass focused lift that keeps the low end clean but on the lighter side, so bass quantity and slam will not satisfy those who want a heavy hitting presentation. Midrange is the clear star, with male and female vocals rendered cleanly and without shout or harshness, helped by controlled bass and relaxed upper treble that let voices sit a little forward in the mix. Treble provides enough energy to prevent the sound from becoming dark and cymbals and high frequency instruments are present without sibilance, but extension, air and sparkle are modest, giving an overall character that is more relaxed and easygoing than bright and exciting.

From a technical standpoint Quark 2 is solid for its price but not a detail monster, with detail retrieval and dynamics sitting around average, an average to slightly below average stage and imaging that still places sounds clearly to the left and right. For budget listeners the mix of clean tonality, good channel matching and the integrated USB C DAC makes the overall sound quality feel excellent at the price, yet when compared directly to the Moondrop Chu II the Quark 2 reaches only around sixty to seventy percent of its performance in bass impact, naturalness, separation and micro detail. Quark 2 clearly wins on cost, isolation, comfort and cable durability, while Chu II still takes the lead for pure sound quality, versatility and accessories, so the better choice depends on whether maximum isolation and convenience or higher technical performance matter more.

Bass: C+ Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C Details: C+ Imaging: B-

ATechReviews original ranking

ATechReviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Moondrop Quarks 2 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $19.99

Buy Moondrop Quarks 2 on Linsoul

Moondrop Quarks 2 reviewed by Audio-In Reviews

Audio-In Reviews 5.6 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
Ultra budget Moondrop Quark 2 focuses on clear, forward vocals with natural upper mids, but bass and treble are on the lighter side and it trails the strongest sub-$30 rivals. Very affordable vocal focused tuning with natural upper mids, clean bass and useful USB C and inline microphone convenience for everyday use. Light bass, relaxed treble and average technical performance make the Quark 2 less engaging than many competing ultra budget sets and not ideal for listeners who want strong impact or sparkle.
Youtube Video Summary

The Moondrop Quark 2 is an ultra budget in ear monitor that comes in around 17 dollars and focuses on practicality and convenience as much as sound. The tiny bullet style shells are easy to wear, the materials feel simple but sturdy enough for daily use, and the built in microphone and USB C termination make it a grab and go option that hobbyists can toss in a bag without worry. At this price it already brings a sense of value before any music starts.

Sonically the tuning leans toward a neutral signature with mid range forwardness, putting vocals and instruments front and center while bass and treble sit slightly in the background. Upper mids are shaped in a way that makes voices and many instruments sound fairly natural, but the lower mids and mid bass sit below a more typical preference, which can leave notes a little thin and lacking weight. Sub bass is emphasized more than mid bass, keeping things clean and avoiding bleed into the mids, yet the overall bass level is still lighter than ideal and does not fully balance the upper mid energy.

The top end has enough treble presence to hear cymbals and higher frequency information, but there is not a lot of shimmer, sparkle or air, so extension and micro detail are limited and the presentation stays on the relaxed side. Technical performance is about what can be expected at this price, with some detail and a stage that is not wide but also not overly intimate. While several rivals like the Chu, Waner and especially the Celest Wyvern Abyss offer a tuning that lines up closer with a typical preference for bass and treble, the Quark 2 still makes sense for vocal focused listeners who value its tidy form factor, built in features and are happy with a slightly leaner and more easygoing sound for seventeen dollars.

Bass: C Mids: B Treble: C+ Soundstage: C+ Details: C+

Audio-In Reviews original ranking

Audio-In Reviews Youtube Channel

Moondrop Quarks 2 reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 4 * score rescaled + normalized
More neutral version of the EW100P with less bass. Absolutely tiny shells. Deep Fit

Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

KZ Duonic (more reviews)

KZ Duonic reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.9 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
This is slightly safe, but has strong bass, it's agressive and wonderful.
Youtube Video Summary

KZ’s Duonic arrives as a budget release built around a new Flux 3 hybrid concept: an 8 mm planar for speed paired with an 8 mm “super-linear” dynamic for bass. The shell is compact, comfortable, and isolates well; the stock cable is functional, though the unique connector makes sticking with KZ cables sensible. Priced around $22–$30 and equipped with DIP switches, it targets flexibility without bloating the accessories.

On the preferred 1-1-1 tuning, the Duonic presents a slightly V-shaped balance with punchy, rich bass, energetic upper-mids, and an elevated air region that gives music a lively, “awake” character. Graph variations mainly shift the lower mids, while >1 kHz remains broadly consistent; compared with sets like KZ’s recent budget darlings, this tuning feels more vibrant and less “scratchy.” Technicals are surprisingly solid at the price—snappy transients and a sense of space—though the treble can get incisive/sizzly and mids occasionally lose focus.

Despite quirks, performance punches far above the sticker, edging into territory usually associated with ~$100 sets and making it a benchmark-worthy budget pick. Tip and cable upgrades would round out the package, but even stock, the Duonic offers a distinctive, dynamic listen that’s easy to recommend for those who enjoy sparkle and bass drive. Listeners sensitive to treble bite may prefer a tamer profile, while everyone else gets a uniquely fun, hyper-competitive sub-$30 option.

Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: B+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your KZ Duonic or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $17

Buy KZ Duonic on Linsoul

KZ Duonic reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 5.8 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech

The KZ Duonic is a budget hybrid that combines a tri-magnetic planar “Flux3” driver with an 8 mm super-linear dynamic, an unusual recipe at this price. KZ markets the pairing as an “acoustic fusion” aimed at clear mids/highs from the planar plus bass reinforcement from the DD, with gaming-oriented spatial cues in mind.

Street pricing sits in the ~$18–25 range depending on version (no-switch, with tuning switches, and a “bass improved” variant), which makes the Duonic firmly entry-level; those variants may yield small shifts in balance, so expectations should account for unit/version differences. Listings from KZ’s store and major retailers also reinforce the hybrid planar+DD design and entry-tier positioning.

Early community impressions suggest a U-shaped tilt—bass emphasis with a tamer lower treble and some upper-treble lift—akin to KZ’s recent budget tunings, which can read lively but may sound lean through the mids and average in staging/detail for the class. Given the cost and configuration, performance expectations are reasonable: engaging bass for the price, competent detail, and imaging/stage that remain typical of the sub-$30 bracket rather than class-leading.


Bass: B+ Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: B Soundstage: B Details: B Imaging: B

Moondrop Quarks 2 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ Duonic User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Moondrop Quarks 2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.6

Gaming Grade

B-

KZ Duonic Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.8

Gaming Grade

B-

Moondrop Quarks 2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Bass C+
It delivers adequate punch and texture, though nothing stands out. Sub-bass presence is hinted rather than delivered.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble C+
Expect a polite treble presentation that balances presence with restraint. Percussion carries a pleasant sparkle.
Dynamics C+
Expect solid impact overall, even if finer gradations feel a touch smoothed. Micro-details could still be sharper.
Soundstage C+
It creates a serviceable arc that keeps instruments apart but rarely draws you into the space. It sounds more intimate than expansive.
Details C+
It rides the line between musicality and analysis, occasionally letting micro-detail slip by. Complex mixes stay organized for the most part.
Imaging B-
Complex mixes stay organized thanks to the improved spatial discipline. Complex passages stay intelligible.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

KZ Duonic Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Bass B+
You get a lively bass response that balances energy with discipline. It balances punch with respectable control.
Mids B
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble B-
Expect a polite treble presentation that balances presence with restraint. Percussion carries a pleasant sparkle.
Dynamics B
Expect energetic dynamics that bring music to life without harshness. It injects enthusiasm into fast music.
Soundstage B
You can map the ensemble with confidence thanks to solid spacing and coherent depth layering. Ambient effects feel believable.
Details B
Finer gestures snap into focus without sounding clinical or forced. Layering holds strong across genres.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement and clear front/back localization. Positions snap into place convincingly.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

Moondrop Quarks 2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

KZ Duonic User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer