Moondrop Quarks 2 VS KZ Gale

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Moondrop Quarks 2 and KZ Gale use 1x Dynamic (7.8mm) and 1DD driver setups respectively. Moondrop Quarks 2 costs $17 while KZ Gale costs $18. KZ Gale is $1 more expensive. KZ Gale holds a decisive 1.1-point edge in reviewer scores (4.9 vs 6). KZ Gale has significantly better bass with a 1.5-point edge, KZ Gale has better treble with a 0.5-point edge, KZ Gale has significantly better dynamics with a 1.1-point edge, KZ Gale has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge, KZ Gale has better details with a 0.9-point edge and KZ Gale has better imaging with a 0.9-point edge.

Insights

Metric Moondrop Quarks 2 KZ Gale
Bass 5 6.5
Mids 6.2 6
Treble 5.2 5.7
Details 5.1 6
Soundstage 5 5.4
Imaging 5.6 6.5
Dynamics 5 6.1
Tonality 5.9 6.3
Technicalities 5.4 5.5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Moondrop Quarks 2 and KZ Gale reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Moondrop Quarks 2 Aggregated Review Score

IEMR Normalized Score

IEMR Normalized Score

4.9

Generally Unfavorable

Reviewer Average Score

5.2

Mixed to Negative


KZ Gale Aggregated Review Score

IEMR Normalized Score

IEMR Normalized Score

6

Mixed to Positive

Reviewer Average Score

6.5

Cautiously Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Moondrop Quarks 2 (more reviews)

Moondrop Quarks 2 reviewed by ATechReviews

ATechReviews 5.9 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
B Tuning
B- Tech
Moondrop Quark 2 offers excellent isolation, clean balanced tuning and strong value from its built in USB C DAC at around 17 USD, though bass slam and overall technical performance remain a step behind the Moondrop Chu II. Outstanding isolation, comfortable ultra light shells and durable USB C cable with integrated DAC and mic at a very low price. Bass impact and overall technical performance are clearly weaker than on the Moondrop Chu II and the fixed cable and strong seal may not suit all listeners.
Youtube Video Summary

Moondrop Quark 2 is a very affordable pair of IEMs around 17 USD that focuses on practicality, combining a fixed USB C cable with an integrated DAC, mic and simple bullet shaped shells. Build feels surprisingly solid for the price, with a sturdy USB C plug that inspires confidence and a light, comfortable fit that can be worn straight down or over ear. Isolation is a major highlight: the seal is so strong that office noise, fans and even mechanical keyboard clatter are largely blocked out, making this a compelling option for commuting or noisy environments, although potential pressure build up should be kept in mind for sensitive users.

On the tuning side Quark 2 delivers a smooth and safe response with a sub bass focused lift that keeps the low end clean but on the lighter side, so bass quantity and slam will not satisfy those who want a heavy hitting presentation. Midrange is the clear star, with male and female vocals rendered cleanly and without shout or harshness, helped by controlled bass and relaxed upper treble that let voices sit a little forward in the mix. Treble provides enough energy to prevent the sound from becoming dark and cymbals and high frequency instruments are present without sibilance, but extension, air and sparkle are modest, giving an overall character that is more relaxed and easygoing than bright and exciting.

From a technical standpoint Quark 2 is solid for its price but not a detail monster, with detail retrieval and dynamics sitting around average, an average to slightly below average stage and imaging that still places sounds clearly to the left and right. For budget listeners the mix of clean tonality, good channel matching and the integrated USB C DAC makes the overall sound quality feel excellent at the price, yet when compared directly to the Moondrop Chu II the Quark 2 reaches only around sixty to seventy percent of its performance in bass impact, naturalness, separation and micro detail. Quark 2 clearly wins on cost, isolation, comfort and cable durability, while Chu II still takes the lead for pure sound quality, versatility and accessories, so the better choice depends on whether maximum isolation and convenience or higher technical performance matter more.

Bass: C+ Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C Details: C+ Imaging: B-

ATechReviews original ranking

ATechReviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Moondrop Quarks 2 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $19.99

Buy Moondrop Quarks 2 on Linsoul

Moondrop Quarks 2 reviewed by Audio-In Reviews

Audio-In Reviews 5.6 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
Ultra budget Moondrop Quark 2 focuses on clear, forward vocals with natural upper mids, but bass and treble are on the lighter side and it trails the strongest sub-$30 rivals. Very affordable vocal focused tuning with natural upper mids, clean bass and useful USB C and inline microphone convenience for everyday use. Light bass, relaxed treble and average technical performance make the Quark 2 less engaging than many competing ultra budget sets and not ideal for listeners who want strong impact or sparkle.
Youtube Video Summary

The Moondrop Quark 2 is an ultra budget in ear monitor that comes in around 17 dollars and focuses on practicality and convenience as much as sound. The tiny bullet style shells are easy to wear, the materials feel simple but sturdy enough for daily use, and the built in microphone and USB C termination make it a grab and go option that hobbyists can toss in a bag without worry. At this price it already brings a sense of value before any music starts.

Sonically the tuning leans toward a neutral signature with mid range forwardness, putting vocals and instruments front and center while bass and treble sit slightly in the background. Upper mids are shaped in a way that makes voices and many instruments sound fairly natural, but the lower mids and mid bass sit below a more typical preference, which can leave notes a little thin and lacking weight. Sub bass is emphasized more than mid bass, keeping things clean and avoiding bleed into the mids, yet the overall bass level is still lighter than ideal and does not fully balance the upper mid energy.

The top end has enough treble presence to hear cymbals and higher frequency information, but there is not a lot of shimmer, sparkle or air, so extension and micro detail are limited and the presentation stays on the relaxed side. Technical performance is about what can be expected at this price, with some detail and a stage that is not wide but also not overly intimate. While several rivals like the Chu, Waner and especially the Celest Wyvern Abyss offer a tuning that lines up closer with a typical preference for bass and treble, the Quark 2 still makes sense for vocal focused listeners who value its tidy form factor, built in features and are happy with a slightly leaner and more easygoing sound for seventeen dollars.

Bass: C Mids: B Treble: C+ Soundstage: C+ Details: C+

Audio-In Reviews original ranking

Audio-In Reviews Youtube Channel

Moondrop Quarks 2 reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 4 * score rescaled + normalized
More neutral version of the EW100P with less bass. Absolutely tiny shells. Deep Fit

Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

KZ Gale (more reviews)

KZ Gale reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.3 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Slightly
Youtube Video Summary

The KZ Gale is a budget single dynamic IEM aimed at gaming, pairing a flashy, almost RGB-style shell with a lightweight, comfortable fit that’s mostly easy to wear. The faceplate glistens nicely and gives a unique, gamey vibe, but some listeners may notice small edges and a circular ridge on the inner shell that can catch on skin or ear hairs and cause slight irritation. Accessories are very basic—standard KZ tips and a typical KZ cable with in-line mic and mute switch—nothing premium, but functional and appropriate for the price.

Tonally, the Gale leans slightly warm in the bass with a noticeable lift in the mid-treble/presence region, giving it a brighter, glassier character that chases detail more than thick, boomy impact. Bass is adequate but not especially deep or rich, while the upper mids and lower treble can come forward enough to bother those sensitive in that area, even though it doesn’t turn truly sibilant. For the asking price around $10–20, the overall sonic quality is quite respectable: open enough, reasonably dynamic, and engaging, especially for listeners who enjoy a bit of extra clarity over warmth.

Compared with other budget sets like the KZ EDC Pro, KZ Dwanic, Kiwi Ears Cadenza or options from Moondrop and others, the Gale trades thicker bass and safer tuning for a brighter, more forward top end and flashy styling. Alternatives may offer more bass weight, warmth, or features (like the Dwanic’s dip switches), and can be better suited to those who dislike upper-mid energy. Still, as a cheap gaming-focused IEM that can also handle music and general use, the KZ Gale comes across as a solid, enjoyable set with a few quirks in fit and tuning that buyers should be aware of rather than outright dealbreakers.

Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: C+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your KZ Gale or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $12

Buy KZ Gale on Linsoul

KZ Gale reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 6.6 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech

The KZ Gale is a budget single-dynamic-driver in-ear monitor aimed squarely at gaming, using KZ’s “super-linear” 10 mm driver with 24 Ω impedance, a claimed 10–20 kHz response and 107 dB/mW sensitivity. The lightweight resin shell with decorative faceplate, detachable 0.75 mm 2-pin silver-plated cable and options for 3.5 mm or Type-C with onboard DSP EQ modes and dual microphones underline its gaming focus rather than audiophile luxury. Across official and retail stores, typical pricing falls in the $10–20 range depending on configuration, firmly placing the Gale in the entry-level gaming IEM segment.

In terms of tuning, Sharmaz Acoustic describes the Gale as balanced-leaning with a “tasteful bass lift” that adds impact while keeping mids clear and treble smooth enough for long sessions, which aligns with its role as an all-rounder for games and music. Community impressions on r/iems compare its tonality closely to the Simgot EW300, noting a neutral-ish signature with slightly forward vocals and non-harsh treble, which is relatively refined in this price class. The end result is a “neutral with bass boost” profile that makes the Gale broadly versatile, though absolute resolution and top-end air remain limited compared to more ambitious, higher-priced IEMs.

On the technical side, bass is reasonably tight with decent punch but only average layering, mids are intelligible and well-placed but not especially textured, and treble detail is adequate yet somewhat soft, contributing to an overall presentation that is clean rather than overtly resolving for critical listening. Several gaming-oriented reviewers highlight the Gale’s imaging and positional accuracy as a key strength at this price, calling footstep localization and directional cues a standout even though the soundstage remains fairly intimate. Overall, the KZ Gale offers strong value as a sub-$20 wired gaming IEM with agreeable tuning and above-average imaging, but its modest detail retrieval and small stage make it more of a capable budget specialist than a class-leading all-rounder.


Bass: B+ Mids: A- Treble: B Dynamics: B Soundstage: B- Details: B Imaging: B+

Moondrop Quarks 2 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ Gale User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Moondrop Quarks 2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.6

Gaming Grade

B-

KZ Gale Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.7

Gaming Grade

B-

Moondrop Quarks 2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Bass C+
It delivers adequate punch and texture, though nothing stands out. Sub-bass presence is hinted rather than delivered.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble C+
Expect a polite treble presentation that balances presence with restraint. Percussion carries a pleasant sparkle.
Dynamics C+
Expect solid impact overall, even if finer gradations feel a touch smoothed. Micro-details could still be sharper.
Soundstage C+
It creates a serviceable arc that keeps instruments apart but rarely draws you into the space. It sounds more intimate than expansive.
Details C+
It rides the line between musicality and analysis, occasionally letting micro-detail slip by. Complex mixes stay organized for the most part.
Imaging B-
Complex mixes stay organized thanks to the improved spatial discipline. Complex passages stay intelligible.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

KZ Gale Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass B+
Low end hits with respectable impact while staying reasonably tidy. You get a healthy sense of rhythm.
Mids B
The region sounds composed and expressive, giving vocals a natural spotlight. It keeps vocals front and center nicely.
Treble B-
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics B
Expect energetic dynamics that bring music to life without harshness. It injects enthusiasm into fast music.
Soundstage C+
You start to perceive distinct rows of players even if the ceiling still feels low. Layering is present but still modest.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances that keeps complex passages intelligible. Micro-details pop without sounding forced.
Imaging B+
Layered vocals and harmonies remain distinct and easy to track. Layered vocals remain easy to track.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

Moondrop Quarks 2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

KZ Gale User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer