TangZu Wan'er S.G VS ND Planet

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

TangZu Wan'er S.G and ND Planet are in-ear monitors. TangZu Wan'er S.G costs $21 while ND Planet costs $20. TangZu Wan'er S.G is $1 more expensive. TangZu Wan'er S.G holds a slight 0.1-point edge in reviewer scores (5.3 vs 5.2). TangZu Wan'er S.G carries a user score of 5. ND Planet has slightly better mids with a 0.4-point edge, ND Planet has better treble with a 0.5-point edge, ND Planet has significantly better dynamics with a 4-point edge and TangZu Wan'er S.G has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric TangZu Wan'er S.G ND Planet
Bass 5.3 5.2
Mids 5.6 6
Treble 4.5 5
Details 4 5.2
Soundstage 5.5 5
Imaging 4.3 5.2
Dynamics 2 6
Tonality 5.6 5.9
Technicalities 4.8 5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough ND Planet reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

TangZu Wan'er S.G Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.3

Mixed to Negative


ND Planet Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.2

Mixed to Negative


Reviews Comparison

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Basically the modded Zero with slight more bass. Most vocal forward out of the $20 sets.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

ND Planet reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Slight vshape all-rounder with punchy bass. KZ EDC PRO better treble extension/smoother, and cheaper.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

TangZu Wan'er S.G (more reviews)

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 6.4 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B Tech
Rating: B- | Value: ⭐⭐⭐ | Comfort: 10 solid tuning driver quality could be better

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 6 * score rescaled + normalized
Budget pick for J-Pop and Female Vocals. Good Bass. Lacking some detail

Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 5.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
C Tech

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Can't believe this is $20.... Details is only okay

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A-

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Comment: It's literally $20, recommended to buy when starting out or as a beater set. Probably the most balanced sounding at its price Average tech like its other counterparts, bass is less controlled

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C+ Mids: B- Treble: C- Soundstage: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: B-

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 3.4 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
D Tech
Solid tuning that could use more extension in the upper region, but a very solid pick for its price.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: D Details: D Imaging: D

TangZu Wan'er S.G reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.7 * score rescaled + normalized
8 community members have rated the TangZu Wan'er S.G at an average of 4.3/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

TangZu Wan'er S.G User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

5

Mixed to Negative

ND Planet User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

TangZu Wan'er S.G Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

ND Planet Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

TangZu Wan'er S.G Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • It sounds pleasant overall, with some uneven spots that hint at room for refinement. Vocals remain pleasant despite the imperfections.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass C+
It delivers adequate punch and texture, though nothing stands out. Sub-bass presence is hinted rather than delivered.
Mids B-
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics E+
Dynamic range feels limited, smearing micro-contrast and transient attack. Soft details are smoothed into the background.
Soundstage B-
It pushes sound outward confidently while leaving height development as an unfinished idea. Height remains subtle but detectable.
Details C-
The presentation is fine for casual listening but leaves refinement on the table. There's some grain on quieter elements.
Imaging C-
Separation is good enough for casual listening yet misses audiophile precision. Depth remains limited but present.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

ND Planet Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble C+
The top end is tidy and serviceable, adding air without overdoing it. Extension is decent for casual listening.
Dynamics B
Dynamic expression is good, delivering solid impact and convincing contrast. Percussion lands with convincing weight.
Soundstage C+
It pushes sound outward confidently while leaving height development as an unfinished idea. Height remains subtle but detectable.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

TangZu Wan'er S.G User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
W wpzdm
5

Gave to my wife

Pros
Good for its price
Cons
Feels muddy. Vocal a bit siblant

ND Planet User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer