oBravo Cupid VS FATfreq x HBB Deuce
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
oBravo Cupid and FATfreq x HBB Deuce use 1DD Planar and 2DD driver setups respectively. oBravo Cupid costs $270 while FATfreq x HBB Deuce costs $239. oBravo Cupid is $31 more expensive. FATfreq x HBB Deuce holds a decisive 5.1-point edge in reviewer scores (2.1 vs 7.2). FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better bass with a 5-point edge, FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better mids with a 6-point edge, FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better treble with a 4.5-point edge and FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better dynamics with a 5-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | oBravo Cupid | FATfreq x HBB Deuce |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 2 | 7 |
| Mids | 1 | 7 |
| Treble | 1 | 5.5 |
| Details | 2 | 7.2 |
| Soundstage | 2.1 | 6 |
| Imaging | 1 | 7.2 |
| Dynamics | 1 | 6 |
| Tonality | 1.9 | 6.6 |
| Technicalities | 2.7 | 5.8 |
oBravo Cupid Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
oBravo Cupid Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD Planar
Tuning Type: V-Shaped
Brand: OBravo Top OBravo IEMs
Price (Msrp): $270
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $239
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
oBravo Cupid User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
oBravo Cupid Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
2.4Gaming Grade
E+FATfreq x HBB Deuce Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.1Gaming Grade
BoBravo Cupid Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
E- Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.
Average Technical Grade
D-- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
oBravo Cupid Reviews
Reviewed by: Crin
3
Reviewer Score
Reviewed by: Precogvision
1.2
Reviewer Score
Precogvision Youtube Channel
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
8.5*
* score normalized
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Audionotions
7.5
Reviewer Score
Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio
7.1
Reviewer Score
Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking
Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Z-Reviews
7
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
6.8
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
6
Reviewer Score
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
oBravo Cupid User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFATfreq x HBB Deuce User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review