ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra VS ND x12

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs
My Ranking My Favorites

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra and ND x12 are in-ear monitors. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra costs $43 while ND x12 costs $50. ND x12 is $7 more expensive. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra holds a decisive 1.3-point edge in reviewer scores (5.8 vs 4.5). ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge and ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge.

Insights

Metric ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra ND x12
Mids 5 4
Treble 5 3
Soundstage 6 6
Dynamics 6 4
Tonality 5 4.5
Technicalities 5 3
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra and ND x12 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed

ND x12 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable

Reviews Comparison

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Great details and bass, so fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: B

Buy ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra on HiFiGO

Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $38.99

Buy ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra on HiFiGO

ND x12 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
D Tech
Cool Design, it's a bit treble forward.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: D Dynamics: C- Soundstage: B

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra (more reviews)

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 5.5 * score rescaled + normalized
check links for more info:

Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

ND x12 (more reviews)

ND x12 reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 4.5 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the ND X12 at an average of 2.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Mixed to Negative.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

ND x12 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

ND x12 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.5

Gaming Grade

D+

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C+
Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.
Dynamics B
The performance feels robust, with satisfying punch and natural transitions. Nuances are easy to follow.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

ND x12 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Mids C-
The region is listenable but lacks the finesse and clarity of better tuning. A touch of EQ can smooth things out.
Treble D
Highs feel erratic, with dips and spikes that make the signature unpredictable. It alternates between splashy and dull.
Dynamics C-
It maintains a steady dynamic profile that neither offends nor inspires. Swells arrive but lack drama.
Soundstage B
A satisfying balance of width and depth yields a stage that feels organized and engaging. Imaging lines up with the intended mix.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

ND x12 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer