EPZ P50 VS Seeaudio Yume

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

EPZ P50 and Seeaudio Yume use 1DD+2BA+2Planar and 1DD+2BA driver setups respectively. EPZ P50 costs $189 while Seeaudio Yume costs $170. EPZ P50 is $19 more expensive. EPZ P50 holds a decisive 1.5-point edge in reviewer scores (7 vs 5.5). EPZ P50 carries a user score of 9.5. EPZ P50 has significantly better bass with a 3.7-point edge, EPZ P50 has better mids with a 0.7-point edge, EPZ P50 has significantly better treble with a 2.2-point edge, EPZ P50 has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and EPZ P50 has significantly better soundstage with a 1.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric EPZ P50 Seeaudio Yume
Bass 8 4.3
Mids 8 7.3
Treble 7.5 5.3
Details 7 4
Soundstage 7 5.5
Imaging 7 4.3
Dynamics 5 4
Tonality 6.8 5.8
Technicalities 7.1 5.4

EPZ P50 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Gizaudio Axel
Tim Tuned Jaytiss Jays Audio
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7

Generally Favorable


Seeaudio Yume Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Tim Tuned Shuwa-T
Super* Review
Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Mixed


EPZ P50 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

9.5

Exceptional

Seeaudio Yume User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EPZ P50 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

Seeaudio Yume Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

EPZ P50 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A+
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble A
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations.

Seeaudio Yume Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

EPZ P50 Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
Bass can be a little bit on the distracting side if you are looking for a neutral sound signature. Contrasty meta-tuning.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your EPZ P50 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $260

Buy EPZ P50 on Aliexpress

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Beautifully done tuning all around Nitpick: Bass dynamic could be better

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: A+

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
For me this has some oddities. It would be higher if those weren't there.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Clean balanced tuning done right. A better tuned MEGA5EST & MOONDROP Meteor with fuller low-end, and more treble extension, same tech, but more dynamic - also half the price. A Mega5EST with better vocals and dynamics but less smooth and airy. Low-end will be weak to some people and on certain tracks. Not the most unique sound since it's clean/neutral/balanced.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech

Seeaudio Yume Reviews

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A- Tech
Vocal benchmark along with EPZ P50 until Volume S, OG Oracles and RSV for most - natural and open vocals. Midranged focus, can use better bass texture and treble extension.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score normalized

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Great tonal balance with beautiful vocals Yume Midnight exist

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: S Treble: B

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Comment: One trick pony. Extremely well tuned Literally everything else

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C- Mids: B Treble: C+ Soundstage: B- Details: C- Imaging: B-

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
D+ Tech
Class-leading tonal balance butchered by subpar technicalities.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: A- Treble: C+ Dynamics: C- Details: C- Imaging: D

EPZ P50 User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
yorxx
9.5

Killabuck.

Pros
No roughness, Natural timbre, Balanced signature, good note density, Very good consistency, comfortable to use, Good cable, Technically amazing, good accessories, good tips, good transparency, good brightness, tactile bass, not much warmth, nice voices.
Cons
None.

Seeaudio Yume User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer