Simgot Supermix 4 and CrinEar Meta use 1DD+1BA+1Planar+1PZT and 1DD+2BA driver setups respectively. Simgot Supermix 4 costs $150 while CrinEar Meta costs $250. CrinEar Meta is $100 more expensive. CrinEar Meta holds a clear 0.8-point edge in reviewer scores (6.5 vs 7.3). Simgot Supermix 4 carries a user score of 6. Simgot Supermix 4 has significantly better bass with a 1-point edge, CrinEar Meta has better mids with a 0.5-point edge, CrinEar Meta has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge and CrinEar Meta has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge.
Insights
Metric | Simgot Supermix 4 | CrinEar Meta |
---|---|---|
Bass | 8 | 7 |
Mids | 7 | 7.5 |
Treble | 6.5 | 7.5 |
Details | 6.5 | 7 |
Soundstage | 6 | 7.3 |
Imaging | 6.5 | 7 |
Dynamics | 6 | 7 |
Tonality | 6.5 | 7.7 |
Technicalities | 6.9 | 7.5 |
Simgot Supermix 4 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
CrinEar Meta Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Simgot Supermix 4 Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+1BA+1Planar+1PZT
Tuning Type: U-shaped (Harman IE 2019)
Brand: Simgot Top Simgot IEMs
Price (Msrp): $149.99
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
CrinEar Meta Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: CrinEar Top CrinEar IEMs
Price (Msrp): $250
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Simgot Supermix 4 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score:
Based on 1 user reviews
6Mixed to Positive
CrinEar Meta User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Simgot Supermix 4 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7Gaming Grade
A-CrinEar Meta Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.5Gaming Grade
ASimgot Supermix 4 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
CrinEar Meta Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.
Average Technical Grade
A- Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Simgot Supermix 4 Reviews
Endgame Harman, one of the smoothest IEMs I've heard with Tangzu Sancai tips (regular). Some units might be hotter in the treble/pzt timbre Jays Audio Youtube Channel
If this works for you, it's a sonic treasure. My unit has issues. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Harman with more treble energy Can be too spicy Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Harman tuning. Soft bass, bright sound, metallic timbre.Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
IEMRanking AI
2025-07-08
The Simgot Supermix 4 packs a quadbrid driver configuration (1DD+1BA+1 Planar+1 PZT) into a comfortable resin shell. Its sound follows a U-shaped signature aligned with the Harman IE 2019 target, emphasizing sub-bass rumble and crisp upper-midrange clarity while keeping lower mids slightly recessed. The bass is deep and textured, though mid-bass punch can feel soft, and vocals sometimes edge into shoutiness at higher volumes.
Treble delivery is a standout, with the planar and PZT drivers offering snappy articulation and air without harsh sibilance. Technical performance is strong for the price, featuring a wide soundstage and precise imaging that excels in gaming scenarios. However, low impedance makes it source-sensitive, and accessories feel minimal with only one set of tips included.
While not class-leading in resolution, the Supermix 4 delivers cohesive tonality across its diverse drivers, making it a versatile choice for bass-forward genres and competitive gaming. Its slight warmth and holographic staging compensate for minor midrange thinning, offering solid value despite fierce competition.
CrinEar Meta Reviews
Versus similar priced IEMs this is probably the IEM I would be buying. Very nice IEM and a little bit on the contrasty side.Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel
Bright-leaning all-rounder with sparkly treble sauce. Great tech for price and great accessories. Good coloration that's not vanilla and safe as other crin collabs. Can be fatiguing at higher volumes, tip dependent, rec sancai wide/regular or Softear Ultra Clear/EPZ clear tips. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
CrinEar Meta lands as a clean, balanced, slightly bright-leaning all-rounder with a distinctly sparkly treble. The top end carries a “special sauce” — sharp attack, quick decay, airy cymbal splash and strong micro-detail — creating an open sense of space with tidy separation and layering at around mid-volume (~65 dB). Bass and vocals sit at a “normal” distance: clear and resolving but not emphasized; expect punch rather than deep sub-bass rumble or chesty slam. Fit is tip-dependent: stock silicones can sound peaky; clear soft EPZ tips keep the shimmer without harshness, while “white” Tongu Senai tips smooth the treble further.
Technically, Meta punches above its $250 bracket, hanging with sets like Dusk 3.5 and Estrella for resolution and imaging despite not using ESTs. Timbre stays natural and the build/accessories feel solid. Trade-offs appear when cranking volume: the treble rise can turn fatiguing past ~75–80 dB, especially on bright, electronic-leaning tracks. Genre picks lean toward pop, J-/K-pop, rock, metal, and indie instrumentals at mid-volumes, where the upper-mid cut reins in hot mixes and the sparkle makes cymbals addictive; for hip-hop/rap/EDM, some will want more rumble, slam, and note weight.
Versus Ziigaat Estrella, it’s apples to oranges: Estrella brings more low-end authority and smoother treble with vocals popping forward, while Meta counters with a brighter, sparklier presentation better for K-/J-pop and bands. Against other bright-neutral sets (Dusk, P5+2, Brain Dance), Meta sounds fuller in the low end with a more natural, less sizzly treble; compared to Canon Pro, it’s the more energetic and less laid-back choice. For pure vocals, Volume S, EPZ P50, or Cadenza 4 remain stronger. Scaling champs like Ziigaat Odyssey and AFUL Explorer take higher volumes better but trade away some of Meta’s detail sparkle. Limited-run caveat aside, this is an easy recommendation for listeners wanting a balanced daily driver with distinct, glittery treble at sensible listening levels.
check links for more info:
Z-Reviews
2025-08-29CrinEar Meta lands as a limited-run, $250 bass-tilted collab that’s already sold out—and feels like a “little baby bass monster” in the best way. Build is clean and understated: aluminum shells with rose-gold accents, a nice interchangeable cable, and an overbuilt hard case that embarrasses most sets at this price. The nozzles are chunky (think Chronicle’s Red/Daybreak vibes), so foam or “render”-style tips help with seal and comfort. Specs are oddly opaque—driver configuration isn’t listed anywhere—yet the package still screams more value than expected.
Tonally this is unapologetically V-shaped: elevated bass that punches on cue, crisp treble that reaches in and gets attention, and a clear midrange that can read V because the ends are lively. The stage is intimate/narrow, giving a “small loud room” energy that’s exciting but can trend fatiguing over long sessions. Crucially, it passes the body-movement test—put on a groove and there’s immediate “wiggly-wigglies”—where a safer, cleaner sibling like Daybreak can feel a bit too polite. Meta sounds less filtered, more gusto, more fun; Daybreak is the seat-belted version.
Chain matters: with spatial enhancement (think soundstage wideners on a fancy DAC), the main gripes fade and the presentation breathes, though even stock the tuning remains engaging and lively. Net take: this is the version of Daybreak many wish existed—more out of the box, more toe-tapping—so it gets the nod on sheer enjoyment. New? It was a steal at $250. Used around $200? No-brainer collector keep if that energetic, bass-forward V is the target.
Similar to Moondrop Dusk (the non-Dusk collab with Crin) but a step down overall sonically (tonality and techs) but a step up in ergonomics and build quality. Unboxing experience is excellent and almost excessive, especially for the price. U-shaped tuning with a focus on deep and powerful bass and sparkly treble. It's an exciting listen and for a first entry from a new brand, it's quite commendable. That said, it lacks a bit of refinement and control on both ends of the frequency response. Bass quantity often overwhelms the mix and there is something odd in the treble that adds an aritificial shimmer that detracts from timbre. Mids are very nice but probably needs a bit more body to balance out the treble and bass. I'd suggest a broad eq down of the bass shelf and some toning down especially of the higher treble region. Previously Owned
Simgot Supermix 4 User Reviews
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewBetter tuned options at this price range.
Pros
Responsiveness to EQCons
Typical harman IEM tuning - thin bodied and honky sounding.CrinEar Meta User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review