Softears RSV VS TangZu Tian Peng

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Softears RSV and TangZu Tian Peng use 5BA and 1DD+6BA+1BC driver setups respectively. Softears RSV costs $730 while TangZu Tian Peng costs $629. Softears RSV is $101 more expensive. Softears RSV holds a slight 0.1-point edge in reviewer scores (7.6 vs 7.4). Softears RSV carries a user score of 7. Softears RSV has significantly better mids with a 2.4-point edge, Softears RSV has significantly better treble with a 1.7-point edge and Softears RSV has better dynamics with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Softears RSV TangZu Tian Peng
Bass 6.8 7.4
Mids 8.4 6
Treble 7.7 6
Details 6.2 7.4
Soundstage 7.5 7.5
Imaging 6.2 7.4
Dynamics 5.5 5
Tonality 7.7 7.2
Technicalities 7 7.7
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough TangZu Tian Peng reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Softears RSV Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Nymz
Gizaudio Axel Crin Shuwa-T Tim Tuned
Jays Audio Jaytiss Super* Review Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

7.6

Strongly Favorable


TangZu Tian Peng Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio Jaytiss Web Search

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Softears RSV reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A+ Tech
One of the best vocals I've heard on any IEM (especially for male artists). Mids and Treble is TOTL, smooth and well extended and has great naturalness and the perfect bite. Bass has great speed and still slams (even though it's BA? not rumbly), but stage and detail is average at it's price, but once it clicks with a track it's one of the most beautiful thing ever. Ran into distortion issues at high volume, but may be due to my source? (RSV too sensitive?)
Youtube Video Summary

Softears RSV breaks the usual BA timbre stigma with a natural, cohesive presentation that avoids the metallic edge often blamed on poor crossovers. Its tuning lifts the upper-mids/early treble just enough to throw vocals into center stage, creating a lively contrast against an otherwise balanced base. At higher volumes the treble feels smooth and correct—cymbal hits sound “right” without glare—while the midrange stays clean, forward, and free of bleed.

Technically, it’s above average but not a show-off: speed, separation, and imaging are tight, yet sets like SA6 Ultra or U12t resolve a touch sharper. Bass carries typical BA traits—quick, textured, but without dynamic-driver slam—though U12t still edges it for bass texture. Where RSV shines is vocal immersion and timbre, arguably among the best under $1,000; just note its source sensitivity at loud listening—pair it with a clean, capable source to avoid distortion. Not a pick for bassheads, but for vocal lovers chasing a smooth, lifelike top end, RSV feels special.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Softears RSV or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $729.99

Buy Softears RSV on HiFiGO

TangZu Tian Peng reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
S- Tech
A cleaner more neutral Bajie with less bass and more treble energy. Clean, slightly vocal forward with some bite. Azla tips for more bass and treble energy/bite but can get shouty - Sancai Nobles for a smoother/neutral/montior like sound. Great tech, but wish it had ESTs like its competition.
Youtube Video Summary

The Tanchjim Fission presents a neutral, balanced, and clean sound signature that is also described as smooth and full. It offers a very natural and laid-back listening experience, making it a strong option for those seeking a safe, non-fatiguing tuning. The technical performance is solid for its price, with good detail retrieval and instrument separation, though it isn't the most dynamic or sparkly set available.

Tip selection is crucial, with recommendations for the Tri Clear or Final E tips to open up the sound, while the Spinfit CP155 can add a touch more bass. The included tuning switches are largely seen as a gimmick; only the middle silver setting is recommended, as the others introduce a significant sub-bass roll-off. The Fission excels with genres like rock, indie, acoustics, and classical at moderate volumes, but its lack of sub-bass rumble and extension makes it a weak choice for hip-hop, EDM, or rap.

Its greatest strength is its value proposition, as it is essentially a cheaper version of the Tanchjim Origin, sharing the same driver and sound profile for a lower cost. This makes competitors like the Moondrop Kato seem less relevant. However, when compared to other all-rounders like the Juzear 4U or Simgot EW300, the Fission faces stiff competition. The EW300, in particular, offers more bass, tuning variety, and similar technicalities for half the price, making the Fission a tougher sell unless its specific brand of smooth, neutral tonality is exactly what you're after.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your TangZu Tian Peng or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $629

Buy TangZu Tian Peng on Linsoul

Softears RSV reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.3 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A+ Tech
Great upper treble, but its overall tonality isn't perfect.
Youtube Video Summary

Softears RSV brings a 5BA recipe with a shell that’s handsome but larger than average, featuring a recessed 2-pin that can fuss with some cables. Comfort is generally fine, yet the size and wide body may test smaller ears. Sonically it’s a neutral-leaning tuning with clean mids and polite highs, but the presentation trades off texture, sub-bass weight, and upper-air sparkle. Stage feels spacious, extension is more average, and while the technicalities are solid, the current crop of mid-fi monitors has pushed beyond what this 2021 design delivers.

Stacked against today’s options, RSV gets pressure from several directions: Elysian Pilgrim hits harder down low with greater perceived clarity; Supernova offers a more natural tonality and better sub-bass; HiSenior Mega5 EST graphs similarly but adds a touch more air; even value picks like a “super mix”/EM10-style V-tune bring fun, slam, and engagement. RSV remains easy to pair and its upper-mids are tastefully set, yet vocals can feel a bit soft—more “fun and cozy” than pristine. At typical new pricing around the mid-$500s it’s tough to champion; catch it closer to $350–$400 (or a good used deal) and it becomes a very enjoyable pick for those who prize smooth mids over maximum bass grip and airy bite.

Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

TangZu Tian Peng reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-08-09
Jaytiss 7.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Packaging is fantastic, sound isn't...
Youtube Video Summary

TangZu Tian Peng arrives as a 1DD + 6BA + 1 bone-conduction hybrid around $630–$650 with a striking, oversized shell that still wears comfortably. The build feels premium: sturdy two-pin sockets, a handsome 4.4 mm cable with a reliable chin slider, and a generous accessory spread including Sancai/Noble-style tips and a genuinely luxury case. Packaging is a highlight—easily in the top tier of unboxings and a big part of the product’s appeal.

Sonically, performance sits in the “fine but middling” camp. The graph promises tasteful bass and controlled upper mids, but in practice the low end lacks impact—coming across a bit flabby—while the mids and treble are merely decent rather than crisp or pristine. Extra energy around 4–6 kHz and ~8 kHz can add hiss/edge, and the overall tone could use more warmth (think earlier bass rise near ~200 Hz). It’s an improvement over the discontinued Baji in air and detail, yet still feels short of expectations at this price.

In comparisons, alternatives like Symphony Ears Prestige (clearer tuning with better balance), Mangird/Xenns Top Pro (more pristine, better controlled treble), Shuoer YU9 (smarter bass rise), or even fun picks such as Punch Audio Martillo and the Zigge Crescent offer stronger value or more engaging sonics. The Tian Peng’s bone-conduction implementation brings some charm but doesn’t transform the experience; given the price-to-performance mismatch, this is a hesitant recommendation—worth a demo if the aesthetics and packaging allure, but not the go-to for pure sound quality.

Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Softears RSV (more reviews)

Softears RSV reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Softears RSV presents as a premium, well-finished all-BA set with five balanced armatures, a secure, slightly deeper fit and above-average isolation. The package feels thoughtful—nice case, multiple tips, cleaning tools—while the shells have a tasteful, dark flake aesthetic. Ergonomically it fills the ear a bit more than comparable models like Moondrop’s S8, but comfort and stability are standouts.

Tonally, RSV opts for a warm, laid-back Harman tilt: elevated sub-bass with restrained mid-bass, even mids with a touch more body than typical Harman, and an upper-mid presence that’s assertive yet not shouty. The treble is notably smooth and controlled—never sharp or sibilant—contributing to an unfatiguing, polished listen. For an all-BA design, the bass is punchy and clean, staying out of the midrange; the main trade-off is a stage that can feel narrower versus more expansive peers.

Against benchmarks, RSV comes across as the “gentleman’s” alternative to the more energetic Moondrop S8 and the livelier, deeper-reaching ThieAudio Monarch, while showing more consistent bass body and smoother treble than DUNU SA6. At roughly $730, it emphasizes balance and refinement over fireworks, earning a solid four-star verdict: extremely competent tuning and execution for those prioritizing maturity, comfort, and smoothness over maximum excitement.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Softears RSV reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech
I prefer the Studio 4. Warmer, bassier, and slightly more resolving than the Studio 4, with great timbre. BA Bass.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Softears RSV reviewed by Crin

Crin 7.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A- Tech
Very well-balanced tonality with surprisingly good timbre, though slightly lacking definition.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Softears RSV reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 7.4 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Mid and vocal centric set, this is not reference tuning despite the name

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A Soundstage: A- Details: A Imaging: A

Softears RSV reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Timbre so beautiful you think it's not a BA set
Youtube Video Summary

Softears RSV delivers a rare combo for a full-BA set: organic timbre without the plasticky edge. The bass carries sufficient weight with a mid-bass emphasis—tight and tasteful rather than earth-shaking, and understandably shy of a DD’s thump. Midrange separation from the bass is clean yet never thin; male vocals keep their body, while female vocals and instruments sound natural, relaxed, and true-to-life. Treble sits neutral and tame—enough sparkle to animate vocals and instruments, but not tuned to spotlight microdetail. Detail retrieval is above average for the price, though not a detail monster, and staging plus imaging sit comfortably slightly outside the head with competent placement. The overall takeaway is a beautiful all-rounder that prioritizes realism and balance over fireworks.

Against peers, RSV squares up closely with Thieaudio Oracle: choose Oracle for more dynamic bass, pick RSV for more organic mids and vocals. Versus sets like Moondrop Variations, RSV trades a touch of separation/analytical edge for fuller lower mids and a more lifelike tonal weight. It won’t chase the widest stages or the sharpest micro-etch, but the tuning and timbre are so dialed that technical trade-offs fade into the background. As the most affordable Softears model, RSV feels like a love letter to musicality: realistic tone, versatile tuning, and a presentation that simply sounds right across genres.

Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: A+

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel

Softears RSV reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B Tech
Well-tuned from top-to-bottom with good timbre. Safe to the point of boredom.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: S Treble: A+ Dynamics: B Details: B Imaging: B

Softears RSV reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 6.3 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
C+ Tech
A BA set that almost sounds like a DD. Needs low OI source. Bass close to U12T with more mid-bass impact. Great treble. Sub-bass and imaging can be lacking for some. My favourite vocals ever.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: B Mids: A+ Treble: A- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Softears RSV reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
8 community members have rated the Softears RSV at an average of 4.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

TangZu Tian Peng (more reviews)

TangZu Tian Peng reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.6 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
S- Tech

The Tangzu Tian Peng offers a V-shaped sound profile that leans towards reference while maintaining musicality, with bass quality being notably source-dependent - it requires amplification to achieve its full physical impact potential. Mids take a step back but remain clean and detailed, while treble presentation varies significantly with eartip choice, becoming bright with Noble tips but more controlled with Azla or Divinus alternatives. Its technical performance shines through strong detail retrieval and decent separation, though the soundstage extends only slightly beyond the head in a circular presentation.

This IEM demands careful system matching as its tonality shifts substantially with different sources, presenting warmer with DAPs like Hiby R6 Pro Max or ONIX xm10 ltd but potentially cold with reference gear. The bone conduction driver contributes to its unique texturing and clarity enhancement according to manufacturer claims, though the overall signature remains heavily influenced by source pairings. Comfort proves a strength with its lightweight resin build enabling extended listening sessions.


Softears RSV User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

7

Generally Favorable

TangZu Tian Peng User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Softears RSV Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.7

Gaming Grade

B+

TangZu Tian Peng Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

Softears RSV Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • You get a polished tonal profile that stays natural from bass through treble. Subtle tuning choices keep things engaging.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Technical chops are reliable, pairing tidy separation with a soundstage that stays conservative. Micro-detail is decent, though never spotlighted.
Bass B+
The bass brings healthy impact, complementing mixes without overpowering them. It keeps up with faster passages cleanly.
Mids A+
The midrange sounds refined and revealing, balancing clarity with emotional weight. Timbre accuracy rivals studio monitors.
Treble A
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics B-
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation that is wide, deep, and tall with precise instrument placement. Width, depth, and height all feel expanded.
Details B
Finer gestures snap into focus without sounding clinical or forced. Layering holds strong across genres.
Imaging B
Instrument boundaries feel well carved, avoiding smear or drift. Instrument outlines feel well-defined.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

TangZu Tian Peng Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • The tonal character feels settled and versatile, with just a few gentle bumps. You can listen for hours without fatigue.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • It delivers a confident technical showing with defined layers and satisfying clarity. You can follow backing vocals with relative ease.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble B
The top end is engaging and airy, yet never overbearing. Brass and strings feel energetic.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage A
All dimensions bloom together, producing an expansive venue that feels carefully rendered. You can map the ensemble easily.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Softears RSV User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Makavelian
7

Solid pick at used prices for those wanting a neutral sound with hint of sub-bass oomph.

Pros
Excellent balanced, all rounder sound signature with natural tonality, vocal reproduction is particularly pleasing.
Cons
Hint of darkness in upper registers affecting overall sense of resolution, bass texture could be better.

TangZu Tian Peng User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer