Softears Volume VS Binary Dynaquattro

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

My Ranking My Favorites

Softears Volume and Binary Dynaquattro use 1DD+2BA and 4DD driver setups respectively. Softears Volume costs $285 while Binary Dynaquattro costs $260. Softears Volume is $25 more expensive. Binary Dynaquattro holds a decisive 1.5-point edge in reviewer scores (5.9 vs 7.4). Binary Dynaquattro has better mids with a 0.5-point edge, Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better dynamics with a 3.5-point edge and Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Metric	Softears Volume	Binary Dynaquattro
Bass	5.6	7.4
Mids	5.5	6
Treble	5.9	6
Details	5.7	7.4
Soundstage	6	7
Imaging	5.5	7.4
Dynamics	4.5	8
Tonality	5.8	7.1
Technicalities	6.1	6.8

Softears Volume Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Score:

5.9

Mixed

Show all Softears Volume reviews

Binary Dynaquattro Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable

Show all Binary Dynaquattro reviews

Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA

Tuning Type: Bright neutral

Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs

Price (Msrp): $285

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Buy your next IEM on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Buy your next IEM on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Driver Configuration: 4DD

Tuning Type: n/a

Price (Msrp): $260

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

$194.99

Buy Binary Dynaquattro on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Buy your next IEM on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Buy your next IEM on

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Softears Volume User Review Score

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Binary Dynaquattro User Review Score

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Softears Volume Gaming Score

The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

Gaming Grade

Binary Dynaquattro Gaming Score

The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.9

Gaming Grade

B+

Softears Volume Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

B-

Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.

Bass B-

Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.

Mids B-

Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.

Treble B-

Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.

Dynamics C

Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.

Soundstage B

Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.

Details B-

Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.

Imaging B-

Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.

Gaming B

Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Binary Dynaquattro Scorings

Average Tunign Grade

A-

Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

B+

Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.

Mids B

Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.

Treble B

Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.

Dynamics A+

Superb dynamic range - powerful yet nuanced. Exceptional transient response with lifelike impact and subtle volume gradations.

Soundstage A-

Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.

Gaming B+

Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Softears Volume Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

7 Reviewer Score

B Tuning

A- Tech

Smooth, slightly splashy treble, but a legend.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Mids: B Treble: A- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

6.5 Reviewer Score

B+ Tuning

A- Tech

check links for more info:

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Crin

6.5 Reviewer Score

A+ Tuning

B Tech

check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

6.3 Reviewer Score

B Tuning

B+ Tech

check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B+ Mids: B- Treble: B+ Soundstage: B Details: A- Imaging: B+

Reviewed by: Z-Reviews

6 * score normalized

check links for more info:

Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Super* Review

6* * score normalized

check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

5.5 Reviewer Score

B- Tuning

A- Tech

Nicely tuned, vocal forward signature Treble air

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel

Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A-

Reviewed by: Precogvision

4.9 Reviewer Score

C+ Tuning

C Tech

Decent tonality but boring dynamics and low-level detailing. Oddly dipped in the mid-treble.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Nymz

4.1 Reviewer Score

D+ Tuning

C Tech

Amp, tip, fit dependent. Pinna gain of death. Technicalities are good, but it's too bright for some, including me. Good for people that listen at VERY low levels and love some bite. Bass lacks intangible aspects.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: C- Details: C+ Imaging: C+