TANGZU Waner VS NiceHCK DB2

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs
My Ranking My Favorites

TANGZU Waner and NiceHCK DB2 are in-ear monitors. TANGZU Waner costs $25 while NiceHCK DB2 costs $22. TANGZU Waner is $3 more expensive. TANGZU Waner holds a clear 0.7-point edge in reviewer scores (5.2 vs 4.5). TANGZU Waner has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, TANGZU Waner has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge and NiceHCK DB2 has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge.

Insights

Metric TANGZU Waner NiceHCK DB2
Mids 5 4
Treble 4 2
Soundstage 6 6
Dynamics 2 5
Tonality 5.9 4.5
Technicalities 4.3 2

TANGZU Waner Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Gizaudio Axel

Average Reviewer Score:

5.2

Mixed to Negative

NiceHCK DB2 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable

TANGZU Waner User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

NiceHCK DB2 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

TANGZU Waner Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.7

Gaming Grade

C

NiceHCK DB2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.8

Gaming Grade

D-

TANGZU Waner Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

NiceHCK DB2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

E+
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming D-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

TANGZU Waner User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

NiceHCK DB2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Recommended Pages

Page
Available IEMs (in stock)
Best IEMs under $50
Best IEMs under $100
Best IEMs under $200
Best IEMs under $600
Best IEMs under $1000
Best bass quality IEMs
Best dynamic range IEMs
IEMs with widest soundstage
IEMs with most details
IEMs with best imaging
Best value IEMs from below $50
Best value IEMs from $50 - $100
Best value IEMs from $100 - $200
Best value IEMs from $200 - $400
Best value IEMs from $400 - $600
Best value IEMs from $600 - $1,000
Buy

Footer